Hi Jocelyn Am 08.09.23 um 16:06 schrieb Jocelyn Falempe: [...]
And know I find that this patch (even in its v1) contains language that retroactively legitimizes the mgag200 patch. I wrote 'apparently' I my reply, as I assume that there's more to it, but how does it not look like an attempt to sneak in something that is known to be controversial?That was not my intention, and I apologize if you feel it this way. My goal was just to clarify if this optimization is acceptable for other
Sorry for throwing accusations around. You certainly act in good faith. Best regards Thomas -- Thomas Zimmermann Graphics Driver Developer SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg, Germany GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew Myers, Andrew McDonald, Boudien Moerman HRB 36809 (AG Nuernberg)
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
