On Mon, 04 Sep 2023 16:28:37 +0200, Maxim Schwalm wrote:
> On 28.08.23 17:59, Michael Tretter wrote:
> > Calculating the byte_clk in kHz is imprecise for a hs_clock of 55687500
> > Hz, which may be used with a pixel clock of 74.25 MHz with mode
> > 1920x1080-30.
> >
> > Fix the calculation by using HZ instead of kHZ.
> >
> > This requires to change the type to u64 to prevent overflows of the
> > integer type.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Tretter <m.tretter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c | 10 ++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
> > index 459be953be55..eb7aca2b9ab7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
> > @@ -973,10 +973,12 @@ static void samsung_dsim_set_display_mode(struct samsung_dsim *dsi)
> > u32 reg;
> >
> > if (dsi->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO) {
> > - int byte_clk_khz = dsi->hs_clock / 1000 / 8;
> > - int hfp = DIV_ROUND_UP((m->hsync_start - m->hdisplay) * byte_clk_khz, m->clock);
> > - int hbp = DIV_ROUND_UP((m->htotal - m->hsync_end) * byte_clk_khz, m->clock);
> > - int hsa = DIV_ROUND_UP((m->hsync_end - m->hsync_start) * byte_clk_khz, m->clock);
> > + u64 byte_clk = dsi->hs_clock / 8;
> > + u64 pix_clk = m->clock * 1000;
> > +
> > + int hfp = DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP((m->hsync_start - m->hdisplay) * byte_clk, pix_clk);
> > + int hbp = DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP((m->htotal - m->hsync_end) * byte_clk, pix_clk);
> > + int hsa = DIV64_U64_ROUND_UP((m->hsync_end - m->hsync_start) * byte_clk, pix_clk);
>
> Wouldn't it make sense to use the videomode structure here?
That would introduce a dependency on VIDEOMODE_HELPERS to avoid four explicit
calculations of the pixel clock in Hz and the porches in pixels. I don't think
that's really worth it.
Michael
>
> >
> > /* remove packet overhead when possible */
> > hfp = max(hfp - 6, 0);
> >
>
> Best regards,
> Maxim
>
