Re: [PATCH] drm/panel/panel-sitronix-st7701: Move init sequence from prepare() to enable()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I appreciate you taking the time to respond!

On 26.08.23 17:18, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 8/26/23 11:55, Mimoja wrote:
"The .prepare() function is typically called before the display controller
starts to transmit video data."
and
"After the display controller has started transmitting video data, it's safe
  to call the .enable() function."

DSI commands are not DSI video, so this should be OK ?

You are correct, my commit message is mixing things up here. I wanted to emphasize roughly the thought of "when enable() is called the dsi core is expected to have its clock initialized". Will take note to clarify this if I succeed to
make a case for this patch below :)

While generally fine this can lead to a fillup of the transmission queue before
the transmission is set up on certain dsi bridges.
This issue can also be seen on downstream imx8m* kernels.

Can you reproduce this with current mainline Linux or linux-next tree ?
I recall the display pipeline in the NXP downstream stuff is very different from mainline .

You are very much correct. The NXP downstream kernel is completely different from the upstream one and is really a great example to show the issue (code cleaned up for readability):

https://github.com/varigit/linux-imx/blob/5.15-2.0.x-imx_var01/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/sec-dsim.c#L1368
```
    ret = drm_panel_prepare(dsim->panel);
    if (unlikely(ret)) [...]

    /* config esc clock, byte clock and etc */
    sec_mipi_dsim_config_clkctrl(dsim);

    ret = drm_panel_enable(dsim->panel);
    if (unlikely(ret)) [...]

```

Which SoC does have this problem ?
Sadly I don't have any SoCs available which would work perfectly with linux-next, let alone are confirmed affected :/

I were able to make my Kingway Panel work (Custom one and so far unsupported by the st7701 driver) with this patch on downstream 5.4 and 5.15 imx8mn as well as on a raspberry pi CM4 with 6.1. However raspberrypi/linux brings SPI support to the st7701 driver which should not affect this but I would just like to document it here. I could not find any success story with st7701 and the rpi on 6.1 online after a short search (and only one reference with 5.10 which seems to me a bit different in a short comparison)  but again I can only offer
circumstantial evidence. Sorry :/

Thank you again
~Mimoja




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux