On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 8:02 PM Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > In the process of adding lockdep annotation for drm GPU scheduler's > job_run() to detect potential deadlock against shrinker/reclaim, I hit > this lockdep splat: > > ====================================================== > WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected > 6.2.0-rc8-debug+ #558 Tainted: G W > ------------------------------------------------------ > ring0/125 is trying to acquire lock: > ffffffd6d6ce0f28 (dev_pm_qos_mtx){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: dev_pm_qos_update_request+0x38/0x68 > > but task is already holding lock: > ffffff8087239208 (&gpu->active_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: msm_gpu_submit+0xec/0x178 > > which lock already depends on the new lock. > > the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: > > -> #4 (&gpu->active_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: > __mutex_lock+0xcc/0x3c8 > mutex_lock_nested+0x30/0x44 > msm_gpu_submit+0xec/0x178 > msm_job_run+0x78/0x150 > drm_sched_main+0x290/0x370 > kthread+0xf0/0x100 > ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 > > -> #3 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}: > __dma_fence_might_wait+0x74/0xc0 > dma_resv_lockdep+0x1f4/0x2f4 > do_one_initcall+0x104/0x2bc > kernel_init_freeable+0x344/0x34c > kernel_init+0x30/0x134 > ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 > > -> #2 (mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start){+.+.}-{0:0}: > fs_reclaim_acquire+0x80/0xa8 > slab_pre_alloc_hook.constprop.0+0x40/0x25c > __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x60/0x1cc > __kmalloc+0xd8/0x100 > topology_parse_cpu_capacity+0x8c/0x178 > get_cpu_for_node+0x88/0xc4 > parse_cluster+0x1b0/0x28c > parse_cluster+0x8c/0x28c > init_cpu_topology+0x168/0x188 > smp_prepare_cpus+0x24/0xf8 > kernel_init_freeable+0x18c/0x34c > kernel_init+0x30/0x134 > ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 > > -> #1 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: > __fs_reclaim_acquire+0x3c/0x48 > fs_reclaim_acquire+0x54/0xa8 > slab_pre_alloc_hook.constprop.0+0x40/0x25c > __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x60/0x1cc > kmalloc_trace+0x50/0xa8 > dev_pm_qos_constraints_allocate+0x38/0x100 > __dev_pm_qos_add_request+0xb0/0x1e8 > dev_pm_qos_add_request+0x58/0x80 > dev_pm_qos_expose_latency_limit+0x60/0x13c > register_cpu+0x12c/0x130 > topology_init+0xac/0xbc > do_one_initcall+0x104/0x2bc > kernel_init_freeable+0x344/0x34c > kernel_init+0x30/0x134 > ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 > > -> #0 (dev_pm_qos_mtx){+.+.}-{3:3}: > __lock_acquire+0xe00/0x1060 > lock_acquire+0x1e0/0x2f8 > __mutex_lock+0xcc/0x3c8 > mutex_lock_nested+0x30/0x44 > dev_pm_qos_update_request+0x38/0x68 > msm_devfreq_boost+0x40/0x70 > msm_devfreq_active+0xc0/0xf0 > msm_gpu_submit+0x10c/0x178 > msm_job_run+0x78/0x150 > drm_sched_main+0x290/0x370 > kthread+0xf0/0x100 > ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 > > other info that might help us debug this: > > Chain exists of: > dev_pm_qos_mtx --> dma_fence_map --> &gpu->active_lock > > Possible unsafe locking scenario: > > CPU0 CPU1 > ---- ---- > lock(&gpu->active_lock); > lock(dma_fence_map); > lock(&gpu->active_lock); > lock(dev_pm_qos_mtx); > > *** DEADLOCK *** > > 3 locks held by ring0/123: > #0: ffffff8087251170 (&gpu->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: msm_job_run+0x64/0x150 > #1: ffffffd00b0e57e8 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}, at: msm_job_run+0x68/0x150 > #2: ffffff8087251208 (&gpu->active_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: msm_gpu_submit+0xec/0x178 > > stack backtrace: > CPU: 6 PID: 123 Comm: ring0 Not tainted 6.2.0-rc8-debug+ #559 > Hardware name: Google Lazor (rev1 - 2) with LTE (DT) > Call trace: > dump_backtrace.part.0+0xb4/0xf8 > show_stack+0x20/0x38 > dump_stack_lvl+0x9c/0xd0 > dump_stack+0x18/0x34 > print_circular_bug+0x1b4/0x1f0 > check_noncircular+0x78/0xac > __lock_acquire+0xe00/0x1060 > lock_acquire+0x1e0/0x2f8 > __mutex_lock+0xcc/0x3c8 > mutex_lock_nested+0x30/0x44 > dev_pm_qos_update_request+0x38/0x68 > msm_devfreq_boost+0x40/0x70 > msm_devfreq_active+0xc0/0xf0 > msm_gpu_submit+0x10c/0x178 > msm_job_run+0x78/0x150 > drm_sched_main+0x290/0x370 > kthread+0xf0/0x100 > ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 > > The issue is that dev_pm_qos_mtx is held in the runpm suspend/resume (or > freq change) path, but it is also held across allocations that could > recurse into shrinker. > > Solve this by changing dev_pm_qos_constraints_allocate() into a function > that can be called unconditionally before the device qos object is > needed and before aquiring dev_pm_qos_mtx. This way the allocations can acquiring > be done without holding the mutex. In the case that we raced with > another thread to allocate the qos object, detect this *after* acquiring > the dev_pm_qos_mtx and simply free the redundant allocations. > > Suggested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Please feel free to add Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> to this patch and the next 2 PM QoS ones in this series. Thanks! > --- > drivers/base/power/qos.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/base/power/qos.c b/drivers/base/power/qos.c > index 8e93167f1783..7e95760d16dc 100644 > --- a/drivers/base/power/qos.c > +++ b/drivers/base/power/qos.c > @@ -185,27 +185,33 @@ static int apply_constraint(struct dev_pm_qos_request *req, > } > > /* > - * dev_pm_qos_constraints_allocate > + * dev_pm_qos_constraints_allocate: Allocate and initializes qos constraints > * @dev: device to allocate data for > * > - * Called at the first call to add_request, for constraint data allocation > - * Must be called with the dev_pm_qos_mtx mutex held > + * Called to allocate constraints before dev_pm_qos_mtx mutex is held. Should > + * be matched with a call to dev_pm_qos_constraints_set() once dev_pm_qos_mtx > + * is held. > */ > -static int dev_pm_qos_constraints_allocate(struct device *dev) > +static struct dev_pm_qos *dev_pm_qos_constraints_allocate(struct device *dev) > { > struct dev_pm_qos *qos; > struct pm_qos_constraints *c; > struct blocking_notifier_head *n; > > - qos = kzalloc(sizeof(*qos), GFP_KERNEL); > + /* > + * If constraints are already allocated, we can skip speculatively > + * allocating a new one, as we don't have to work about qos transitioning > + * from non-null to null. The constraints are only freed on device > + * removal. > + */ > + if (dev->power.qos) > + return NULL; > + > + qos = kzalloc(sizeof(*qos) + 3 * sizeof(*n), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!qos) > - return -ENOMEM; > + return NULL; > > - n = kzalloc(3 * sizeof(*n), GFP_KERNEL); > - if (!n) { > - kfree(qos); > - return -ENOMEM; > - } > + n = (struct blocking_notifier_head *)(qos + 1); > > c = &qos->resume_latency; > plist_head_init(&c->list); > @@ -227,11 +233,29 @@ static int dev_pm_qos_constraints_allocate(struct device *dev) > > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&qos->flags.list); > > + return qos; > +} > + > +/* > + * dev_pm_qos_constraints_set: Ensure dev->power.qos is set > + * > + * If dev->power.qos is already set, free the newly allocated qos constraints. > + * Otherwise set dev->power.qos. Must be called with dev_pm_qos_mtx held. > + * > + * This split unsynchronized allocation and synchronized set moves allocation > + * out from under dev_pm_qos_mtx, so that lockdep does does not get angry about > + * drivers which use dev_pm_qos in paths related to shrinker/reclaim. > + */ > +static void dev_pm_qos_constraints_set(struct device *dev, struct dev_pm_qos *qos) > +{ > + if (dev->power.qos) { > + kfree(qos); > + return; > + } > + > spin_lock_irq(&dev->power.lock); > dev->power.qos = qos; > spin_unlock_irq(&dev->power.lock); > - > - return 0; > } > > static void __dev_pm_qos_hide_latency_limit(struct device *dev); > @@ -309,7 +333,6 @@ void dev_pm_qos_constraints_destroy(struct device *dev) > dev->power.qos = ERR_PTR(-ENODEV); > spin_unlock_irq(&dev->power.lock); > > - kfree(qos->resume_latency.notifiers); > kfree(qos); > > out: > @@ -341,7 +364,7 @@ static int __dev_pm_qos_add_request(struct device *dev, > if (IS_ERR(dev->power.qos)) > ret = -ENODEV; > else if (!dev->power.qos) > - ret = dev_pm_qos_constraints_allocate(dev); > + ret = -ENOMEM; > > trace_dev_pm_qos_add_request(dev_name(dev), type, value); > if (ret) > @@ -388,9 +411,11 @@ static int __dev_pm_qos_add_request(struct device *dev, > int dev_pm_qos_add_request(struct device *dev, struct dev_pm_qos_request *req, > enum dev_pm_qos_req_type type, s32 value) > { > + struct dev_pm_qos *qos = dev_pm_qos_constraints_allocate(dev); > int ret; > > mutex_lock(&dev_pm_qos_mtx); > + dev_pm_qos_constraints_set(dev, qos); > ret = __dev_pm_qos_add_request(dev, req, type, value); > mutex_unlock(&dev_pm_qos_mtx); > return ret; > @@ -535,14 +560,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_qos_remove_request); > int dev_pm_qos_add_notifier(struct device *dev, struct notifier_block *notifier, > enum dev_pm_qos_req_type type) > { > + struct dev_pm_qos *qos = dev_pm_qos_constraints_allocate(dev); > int ret = 0; > > mutex_lock(&dev_pm_qos_mtx); > > + dev_pm_qos_constraints_set(dev, qos); > + > if (IS_ERR(dev->power.qos)) > ret = -ENODEV; > - else if (!dev->power.qos) > - ret = dev_pm_qos_constraints_allocate(dev); > > if (ret) > goto unlock; > @@ -903,12 +929,22 @@ s32 dev_pm_qos_get_user_latency_tolerance(struct device *dev) > */ > int dev_pm_qos_update_user_latency_tolerance(struct device *dev, s32 val) > { > - int ret; > + struct dev_pm_qos *qos = dev_pm_qos_constraints_allocate(dev); > + int ret = 0; > > mutex_lock(&dev_pm_qos_mtx); > > - if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dev->power.qos) > - || !dev->power.qos->latency_tolerance_req) { > + dev_pm_qos_constraints_set(dev, qos); > + > + if (IS_ERR(dev->power.qos)) > + ret = -ENODEV; > + else if (!dev->power.qos) > + ret = -ENOMEM; > + > + if (ret) > + goto out; > + > + if (!dev->power.qos->latency_tolerance_req) { > struct dev_pm_qos_request *req; > > if (val < 0) { > -- > 2.41.0 >