Hi Mirsad,
well this is a false positive.
That drm_sched_entity_is_ready() doesn't see the data written by
drm_sched_entity_push_job() is part of the logic here.
Regards,
Christian.
Am 18.08.23 um 15:44 schrieb Mirsad Todorovac:
On 8/17/23 21:54, Mirsad Todorovac wrote:
Hi,
This is your friendly bug reporter.
The environment is vanilla torvalds tree kernel on Ubuntu 22.04 LTS
and a Ryzen 7950X box.
Please find attached the complete dmesg output from the ring buffer
and lshw output.
NOTE: The kernel reports tainted kernel, but to my knowledge there
are no proprietary (G) modules,
but this taint is turned on by the previous bugs.
dmesg excerpt:
[ 8791.864576]
==================================================================
[ 8791.864648] BUG: KCSAN: data-race in drm_sched_entity_is_ready
[gpu_sched] / drm_sched_entity_push_job [gpu_sched]
[ 8791.864776] write (marked) to 0xffff9b74491b7c40 of 8 bytes by
task 3807 on cpu 18:
[ 8791.864788] drm_sched_entity_push_job+0xf4/0x2a0 [gpu_sched]
[ 8791.864852] amdgpu_cs_ioctl+0x3888/0x3de0 [amdgpu]
[ 8791.868731] drm_ioctl_kernel+0x127/0x210 [drm]
[ 8791.869222] drm_ioctl+0x38f/0x6f0 [drm]
[ 8791.869711] amdgpu_drm_ioctl+0x7e/0xe0 [amdgpu]
[ 8791.873660] __x64_sys_ioctl+0xd2/0x120
[ 8791.873676] do_syscall_64+0x58/0x90
[ 8791.873688] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x73/0xdd
[ 8791.873710] read to 0xffff9b74491b7c40 of 8 bytes by task 1119 on
cpu 27:
[ 8791.873722] drm_sched_entity_is_ready+0x16/0x50 [gpu_sched]
[ 8791.873786] drm_sched_select_entity+0x1c7/0x220 [gpu_sched]
[ 8791.873849] drm_sched_main+0xd2/0x500 [gpu_sched]
[ 8791.873912] kthread+0x18b/0x1d0
[ 8791.873924] ret_from_fork+0x43/0x70
[ 8791.873939] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
[ 8791.873955] value changed: 0x0000000000000000 -> 0xffff9b750ebcfc00
[ 8791.873971] Reported by Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer on:
[ 8791.873980] CPU: 27 PID: 1119 Comm: gfx_0.0.0 Tainted:
G L 6.5.0-rc6-net-cfg-kcsan-00038-g16931859a650 #35
[ 8791.873994] Hardware name: ASRock X670E PG Lightning/X670E PG
Lightning, BIOS 1.21 04/26/2023
[ 8791.874002]
==================================================================
P.S.
According to Mr. Heo's instructions, I am adding the unwound trace here:
[ 1879.706518]
==================================================================
[ 1879.706616] BUG: KCSAN: data-race in drm_sched_entity_is_ready
[gpu_sched] / drm_sched_entity_push_job [gpu_sched]
[ 1879.706737] write (marked) to 0xffff8f3672748c40 of 8 bytes by task
4087 on cpu 10:
[ 1879.706748] drm_sched_entity_push_job
(./include/drm/spsc_queue.h:74
drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c:574) gpu_sched
[ 1879.706808] amdgpu_cs_ioctl
(drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c:1375
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c:1469) amdgpu
[ 1879.710589] drm_ioctl_kernel (drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c:788) drm
[ 1879.711068] drm_ioctl (drivers/gpu/drm/drm_ioctl.c:892) drm
[ 1879.711551] amdgpu_drm_ioctl
(drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c:2748) amdgpu
[ 1879.715319] __x64_sys_ioctl (fs/ioctl.c:51 fs/ioctl.c:870
fs/ioctl.c:856 fs/ioctl.c:856)
[ 1879.715334] do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:50
arch/x86/entry/common.c:80)
[ 1879.715345] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe
(arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:120)
[ 1879.715365] read to 0xffff8f3672748c40 of 8 bytes by task 1098 on
cpu 11:
[ 1879.715376] drm_sched_entity_is_ready
(drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c:134) gpu_sched
[ 1879.715435] drm_sched_select_entity
(drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c:248
drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c:893) gpu_sched
[ 1879.715495] drm_sched_main
(drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c:1019) gpu_sched
[ 1879.715554] kthread (kernel/kthread.c:389)
[ 1879.715563] ret_from_fork (arch/x86/kernel/process.c:145)
[ 1879.715575] ret_from_fork_asm (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:312)
[ 1879.715590] value changed: 0x0000000000000000 -> 0xffff8f360663dc00
[ 1879.715604] Reported by Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer on:
[ 1879.715612] CPU: 11 PID: 1098 Comm: gfx_0.0.0 Tainted:
G L 6.5.0-rc6+ #47
[ 1879.715624] Hardware name: ASRock X670E PG Lightning/X670E PG
Lightning, BIOS 1.21 04/26/2023
[ 1879.715631]
==================================================================
It seems that the line in question might be:
first = spsc_queue_push(&entity->job_queue, &sched_job->queue_node);
which expands to:
static inline bool spsc_queue_push(struct spsc_queue *queue, struct
spsc_node *node)
{
struct spsc_node **tail;
node->next = NULL;
preempt_disable();
tail = (struct spsc_node **)atomic_long_xchg(&queue->tail,
(long)&node->next);
WRITE_ONCE(*tail, node);
atomic_inc(&queue->job_count);
/*
* In case of first element verify new node will be visible to the
consumer
* thread when we ping the kernel thread that there is new work to
do.
*/
smp_wmb();
preempt_enable();
return tail == &queue->head;
}
According to the manual, preempt_disable() only guaranteed exclusion
on a single CPU/core/thread, so
we might be plagued with the slow, old fashioned locking unless anyone
had a better idea.
Best regards,
Mirsad Todorovac
