On 07/05/2013 10:03 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Joonyoung,
On Friday 05 July 2013 15:30:25 Joonyoung Shim wrote:
On 07/05/2013 02:38 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Joonyoung Shim wrote:
On 07/04/2013 07:11 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Friday 28 June 2013 14:24:43 Joonyoung Shim wrote:
Hello,
This is the second version patchset.
GEM CMA supports dma_buf but it needs GEM CMA specific functionality
for dma_buf. We can use prime helpers for dma_buf by commit
89177644a7b6306e6084a89eab7e290f4bfef397 "drm: add prime helpers", so
this patchset is to replace from using GEM CMA specific functions to
using prime helpers.
To Laurent,
It is merged a patch to cache mapping from DRM Prime, can this patchset
get your ack?
There you go (and sorry for the late reply)
Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
By the way, between the initial version of the GEM CMA PRIME patch and
the version that got merged in v3.10, commit
011c2282c74db120f01a8414edc66c3f217f5511 ("drm: prime: fix refcounting
on the dmabuf import error path") was introduced. The GEM CMA PRIME code
in v3.10 thus has a refcounting bug :-(
Should this patch set go to -stable, or should we cook up a special fix
?
I'm not sure it's better to choose which way.
Dave, how we should do about that problem?
I think a special fix for stable once we get these merged to Linus.
OK, i will post a patch for a special fix.
Thank you.
We need to fix the problem for v3.11 as well, by applying either this set or
the fix you have just sent. I have no strong preference regarding which
patches to pick.
I also don't care, but i can report v3 patchset based on a patch for a
special fix for commit consistency.
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
