On 07/05/2013 02:38 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 07/04/2013 07:11 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Joonyoung,
Thank you for the patches.
On Friday 28 June 2013 14:24:43 Joonyoung Shim wrote:
Hello,
This is the second version patchset.
GEM CMA supports dma_buf but it needs GEM CMA specific functionality for
dma_buf. We can use prime helpers for dma_buf by commit
89177644a7b6306e6084a89eab7e290f4bfef397 "drm: add prime helpers", so
this patchset is to replace from using GEM CMA specific functions to
using prime helpers.
To Laurent,
It is merged a patch to cache mapping from DRM Prime, can this patchset
get your ack?
There you go (and sorry for the late reply)
Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
By the way, between the initial version of the GEM CMA PRIME patch and the
version that got merged in v3.10, commit
011c2282c74db120f01a8414edc66c3f217f5511 ("drm: prime: fix refcounting on
the
dmabuf import error path") was introduced. The GEM CMA PRIME code in v3.10
thus has a refcounting bug :-(
Should this patch set go to -stable, or should we cook up a special fix ?
I'm not sure it's better to choose which way.
Dave, how we should do about that problem?
I think a special fix for stable once we get these merged to Linus.
OK, i will post a patch for a special fix.
Thanks.
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
