Re: nouveau bug in linux/6.1.38-2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 4, 2023 at 2:02 PM Thorsten Leemhuis
<regressions@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> On 02.08.23 23:28, Olaf Skibbe wrote:
> > Dear Maintainers,
> >
> > Hereby I would like to report an apparent bug in the nouveau driver in
> > linux/6.1.38-2.
>
> Thx for your report. Maybe your problem is caused by a incomplete
> backport. I Cced the maintainers for the drivers (and the regressions
> and the stable list), maybe one of them has an idea, as they know the
> driver.
>
> If they don't reply in the next few days, please check if the problem is
> also present in mainline. If not, check if the latest 6.1.y. release
> already fixes this. If not, try to check which of the four patches you
> reverted to make things going is actually causing this (e.g. first only
> revert the one that was applied last; then the two last ones; ...).
>
> > Running a current debian stable on a Dell Latitude E6510 with a
> > "NVIDIA Corporation GT218M" graphic card, the monitor turns black
> > after the grub screen. Also switching to a console (Strg-Alt-F2) shows
> > just a black screen. Access via ssh is possible.
> >
> > ~# uname -r
> > 6.1.0-10-amd64
> >
> > demesg shows the following error message:
> >
> > [    3.560153] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 176 at
> > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/disp/dp.c:460
> > nvkm_dp_acquire+0x26a/0x490 [nouveau]
> > [    3.560287] Modules linked in: sd_mod t10_pi sr_mod crc64_rocksoft
> > cdrom crc64 crc_t10dif crct10dif_generic nouveau(+) ahci libahci mxm_wmi
> > i2c_algo_bit drm_display_helper libata cec rc_core drm_ttm_helper ttm
> > scsi_mod e1000e drm_kms_helper ptp firewire_ohci sdhci_pci cqhci
> > ehci_pci sdhci ehci_hcd firewire_core i2c_i801 crct10dif_pclmul
> > crct10dif_common drm crc32_pclmul crc32c_intel psmouse usbcore mmc_core
> > crc_itu_t pps_core scsi_common i2c_smbus lpc_ich usb_common battery
> > video wmi button
> > [    3.560322] CPU: 0 PID: 176 Comm: kworker/u16:5 Not tainted
> > 6.1.0-10-amd64 #1  Debian 6.1.38-2
> > [    3.560325] Hardware name: Dell Inc. Latitude E6510/0N5KHN, BIOS A17
> > 05/12/2017
> > [    3.560327] Workqueue: nvkm-disp nv50_disp_super [nouveau]
> > [    3.560433] RIP: 0010:nvkm_dp_acquire+0x26a/0x490 [nouveau]
> > [    3.560538] Code: 48 8b 44 24 58 65 48 2b 04 25 28 00 00 00 0f 85 37
> > 02 00 00 48 83 c4 60 44 89 e0 5b 5d 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 41 5f c3 cc cc cc
> > cc <0f> 0b c1 e8 03 41 88 6d 62 44 89 fe 48 89 df 48 69 c0 cf 0d d6 26
> > [    3.560541] RSP: 0018:ffff9899c048bd60 EFLAGS: 00010246
> > [    3.560542] RAX: 0000000000041eb0 RBX: ffff88e0209d2600 RCX:
> > 0000000000041eb0
> > [    3.560544] RDX: ffffffffc079f760 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI:
> > ffff9899c048bcf0
> > [    3.560545] RBP: 0000000000000001 R08: ffff9899c048bc64 R09:
> > 0000000000005b76
> > [    3.560546] R10: 000000000000000d R11: ffff9899c048bde0 R12:
> > 00000000ffffffea
> > [    3.560548] R13: ffff88e00b39e480 R14: 0000000000044d45 R15:
> > 0000000000000000
> > [    3.560549] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88e123c00000(0000)
> > knlGS:0000000000000000
> > [    3.560551] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> > [    3.560552] CR2: 00007f57f4e90451 CR3: 0000000181410000 CR4:
> > 00000000000006f0
> > [    3.560554] Call Trace:
> > [    3.560558]  <TASK>
> > [    3.560560]  ? __warn+0x7d/0xc0
> > [    3.560566]  ? nvkm_dp_acquire+0x26a/0x490 [nouveau]
> > [    3.560671]  ? report_bug+0xe6/0x170
> > [    3.560675]  ? handle_bug+0x41/0x70
> > [    3.560679]  ? exc_invalid_op+0x13/0x60
> > [    3.560681]  ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20
> > [    3.560685]  ? init_reset_begun+0x20/0x20 [nouveau]
> > [    3.560769]  ? nvkm_dp_acquire+0x26a/0x490 [nouveau]
> > [    3.560888]  nv50_disp_super_2_2+0x70/0x430 [nouveau]
> > [    3.560997]  nv50_disp_super+0x113/0x210 [nouveau]
> > [    3.561103]  process_one_work+0x1c7/0x380
> > [    3.561109]  worker_thread+0x4d/0x380
> > [    3.561113]  ? rescuer_thread+0x3a0/0x3a0
> > [    3.561116]  kthread+0xe9/0x110
> > [    3.561120]  ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20
> > [    3.561122]  ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
> > [    3.561130]  </TASK>
> >
> > Further information:
> >
> > $ lspci -v -s $(lspci | grep -i vga | awk '{ print $1 }')
> > 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GT218M [NVS 3100M]
> > (rev a2) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
> >     Subsystem: Dell Latitude E6510
> >     Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 27
> >     Memory at e2000000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16M]
> >     Memory at d0000000 (64-bit, prefetchable) [size=256M]
> >     Memory at e0000000 (64-bit, prefetchable) [size=32M]
> >     I/O ports at 7000 [size=128]
> >     Expansion ROM at 000c0000 [disabled] [size=128K]
> >     Capabilities: <access denied>
> >     Kernel driver in use: nouveau
> >     Kernel modules: nouveau
> >
> > I reported this bug to debian already, see
> > https://bugs.debian.org/1042753 for context.
> >
> > With support (thanks Diederik!) I managed to figure out that the cause
> > was a regression between upstream kernel version 6.1.27 and 6.1.38.
> >
> > I build a new 6.1.38 kernel with these commits reverted:
> >
> > 62aecf23f3d1 drm/nouveau: add nv_encoder pointer check for NULL
> > fb725beca62d drm/nouveau/dp: check for NULL nv_connector->native_mode
> > 90748be0f4f3 drm/nouveau: don't detect DSM for non-NVIDIA device
> > 5a144bad3e75 nouveau: fix client work fence deletion race
> >

mind retrying with only fb725beca62d and 62aecf23f3d1 reverted? Would
be weird if the other two commits are causing it. If that's the case,
it's a bit worrying that reverting either of the those causes issues,
but maybe there is a good reason for it. Anyway, mind figuring out
which of the two you need reverted to fix your issue? Thanks!

> > With that kernel the graphic works again.
> >
> > Please inform me if further tests are required.
>
> FWIW, to be sure the issue doesn't fall through the cracks unnoticed,
> I'm adding it to regzbot, the Linux kernel regression tracking bot:
>
> #regzbot ^introduced v6.1.27..v6.1.38
> #regzbot title drm/nouveau: display stays black
> #regzbot ignore-activity
>
> This isn't a regression? This issue or a fix for it are already
> discussed somewhere else? It was fixed already? You want to clarify when
> the regression started to happen? Or point out I got the title or
> something else totally wrong? Then just reply and tell me -- ideally
> while also telling regzbot about it, as explained by the page listed in
> the footer of this mail.
>
> Developers: When fixing the issue, remember to add 'Link:' tags pointing
> to the report (the parent of this mail). See page linked in footer for
> details.
>
> Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
> --
> Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
> https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
> That page also explains what to do if mails like this annoy you.
>





[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux