[Why]
There is no need to consider payload->delete case since we won't call
drm_dp_add_payload_part2() to create a payload when we're about to
remove it.
[How]
Delete unnecessary case to simplify the code.
Signed-off-by: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 8 ++------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
index ed96cfcfa304..4d80426757ab 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
@@ -3411,12 +3411,8 @@ int drm_dp_add_payload_part2(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
ret = drm_dp_create_payload_step2(mgr, payload);
if (ret < 0) {
- if (!payload->delete)
- drm_err(mgr->dev, "Step 2 of creating MST payload for %p failed: %d\n",
- payload->port, ret);
- else
- drm_dbg_kms(mgr->dev, "Step 2 of removing MST payload for %p failed: %d\n",
- payload->port, ret);
+ drm_err(mgr->dev, "Step 2 of creating MST payload for %p failed: %d\n",
+ payload->port, ret);
}
return ret;
--
2.37.3
