On 01/08/2023 18:34, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Tue, 01 Aug 2023, Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> And it is unfortunate that you and @208suo.com people doesn't reply to >> review comments (try searching lore.kernel.org) > > Essentially a one-way firehose of patches pointed at our general > direction is not benefitial to the community. It's not participation, > it's not co-operation. If the review gets ignored, why should we invest > our time on *any* of the patches? > > Well, I guess this is the kind of "hey, some new orgs spam us tens of trivial patches, then we review them as usual, but people from that org are deaf in regards of our reviews (maybe deliberately?)". The exact same situation happened last year with @cdjrlc.com people, when they were notoriously known for spell-fixing and redundant word fixing patches. Many of these patches were correct, but some of them were not, triggering reviews requesting changes. Yet, they also ignore the reviews. Thanks. -- An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara