Re: [PATCH 7/7] drm/msm/dpu: move INTF tearing checks to dpu_encoder_phys_cmd_init

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 27/07/2023 23:25, Marijn Suijten wrote:
On 2023-07-27 22:22:20, Marijn Suijten wrote:
On 2023-07-27 19:21:04, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
As the INTF is fixed at the encoder creation time, we can move the
check whether INTF supports tearchck to dpu_encoder_phys_cmd_init().
This function can return an error if INTF doesn't have required feature.
Performing this check in dpu_encoder_phys_cmd_tearcheck_config() is less
useful, as this function returns void.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  .../drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_cmd.c  | 37 +++++++++++--------
  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_cmd.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_cmd.c
index 04a1106101a7..e1dd0e1b4793 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_cmd.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_cmd.c
@@ -325,24 +325,17 @@ static void dpu_encoder_phys_cmd_tearcheck_config(
  	unsigned long vsync_hz;
  	struct dpu_kms *dpu_kms;
- if (phys_enc->has_intf_te) {
-		if (!phys_enc->hw_intf ||
-		    !phys_enc->hw_intf->ops.enable_tearcheck) {
-			DPU_DEBUG_CMDENC(cmd_enc, "tearcheck not supported\n");
-			return;
-		}
-
-		DPU_DEBUG_CMDENC(cmd_enc, "");
-	} else {
-		if (!phys_enc->hw_pp ||
-		    !phys_enc->hw_pp->ops.enable_tearcheck) {
-			DPU_DEBUG_CMDENC(cmd_enc, "tearcheck not supported\n");
-			return;
-		}
-
-		DPU_DEBUG_CMDENC(cmd_enc, "pp %d\n", phys_enc->hw_pp->idx - PINGPONG_0);
+	if (!phys_enc->has_intf_te &&
+	    (!phys_enc->hw_pp ||
+	     !phys_enc->hw_pp->ops.enable_tearcheck)) {

when is hw_pp assigned?  Can't we also check that somewhere in an init
phase?

It would happen right before dpu_encoder_phys_cmd_atomic_mode_set()
where we already happen to check has_intf_te to switch on PP
intr_readptr vs INTF intr_tear_rd_ptr.  Might be the perfect place for
the pingpong callback checks?

The problem is that mode_set doesn't return an error (by design). I'd put a TODO here, so that if we ever move/change resource allocation, this check can be done next to it (atomic_check isn't a good place, since phys_enc.atomic_check happens before resource reallocation).


- Marijn


Also, you won't go over 100 chars (not even 80) by having the (!... ||
!...) on a single line.

+		DPU_DEBUG_CMDENC(cmd_enc, "tearcheck not supported\n");
+		return;
  	}
+ DPU_DEBUG_CMDENC(cmd_enc, "intf %d pp %d\n",
+			 phys_enc->hw_intf->idx - INTF_0,
+			 phys_enc->hw_pp->idx - PINGPONG_0);
+
  	mode = &phys_enc->cached_mode;
dpu_kms = phys_enc->dpu_kms;
@@ -768,9 +761,21 @@ struct dpu_encoder_phys *dpu_encoder_phys_cmd_init(
  	phys_enc->intf_mode = INTF_MODE_CMD;
  	cmd_enc->stream_sel = 0;
+ if (!phys_enc->hw_intf) {
+		DPU_ERROR_CMDENC(cmd_enc, "no INTF provided\n");
+
+		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+	}
+
  	if (phys_enc->dpu_kms->catalog->mdss_ver->core_major_ver >= 5)
  		phys_enc->has_intf_te = true;
+ if (phys_enc->has_intf_te && !phys_enc->hw_intf->ops.enable_tearcheck) {

Any other callbacks we could check here, and remove the checks
elsewhere?

As with enable_tearcheck() though, it does make the code less consistent
with its PP counterpart, which is checked ad-hoc everywhere (but maybe
that is fixable too).

- Marijn

+		DPU_ERROR_CMDENC(cmd_enc, "tearcheck not supported\n");
+
+		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+	}
+
  	atomic_set(&cmd_enc->pending_vblank_cnt, 0);
  	init_waitqueue_head(&cmd_enc->pending_vblank_wq);
--
2.39.2


--
With best wishes
Dmitry




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux