Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: lpfc: Fix potential deadlock on &ndlp->lock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: lpfc: Fix potential deadlock on &ndlp->lock
From: Chengfeng Ye <dg573847474@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 13:21:57 +0800
Cc: linaro-mm-sig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-scsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20230726181322.26754-1-dg573847474@gmail.com>
References: <20230726181322.26754-1-dg573847474@gmail.com>

Sorry for the interruption, I just notice that the ndlp node
inside timer does not share with that of lpfc_cleanup_pending_mbox().

This is a false alarm and sorry again for this.

Best regards,
Chengfeng

References:
- [PATCH v2] scsi: lpfc: Fix potential deadlock on &ndlp->lock
  - From: Chengfeng Ye

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: qcom: Update RPMHPD entries for some SoCs
Next by Date: [PATCH v2] scsi: lpfc: Fix potential deadlock on &ndlp->lock
Previous by thread: [PATCH v2] scsi: lpfc: Fix potential deadlock on &ndlp->lock
Next by thread: [PATCH -next] drm/bridge: fix -Wunused-const-variable= warning
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux DRI Users] [Linux Intel Graphics] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [XFree86] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [XFree86]

Powered by Linux