On 7/25/2023 5:40 AM, Colin Ian King wrote:
Pointer pexec is being assigned a value however it is never read. The
assignment is redundant and can be removed.
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/accel/qaic/qaic_data.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/accel/qaic/qaic_data.c b/drivers/accel/qaic/qaic_data.c
index e9a1cb779b30..8a6cb14f490e 100644
--- a/drivers/accel/qaic/qaic_data.c
+++ b/drivers/accel/qaic/qaic_data.c
@@ -1320,7 +1320,6 @@ static int __qaic_execute_bo_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct dr
user_data = u64_to_user_ptr(args->data);
exec = kcalloc(args->hdr.count, size, GFP_KERNEL);
- pexec = (struct qaic_partial_execute_entry *)exec;
if (!exec)
return -ENOMEM;
It does look like pexec is not used in this function after it was
refactored. Shouldn't the declaration at the beginning of the function
also be removed?