[AMD Official Use Only - General] > -----Original Message----- > From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2023 10:16 PM > To: Quan, Evan <Evan.Quan@xxxxxxx> > Cc: rafael@xxxxxxxxxx; lenb@xxxxxxxxxx; Deucher, Alexander > <Alexander.Deucher@xxxxxxx>; Koenig, Christian > <Christian.Koenig@xxxxxxx>; Pan, Xinhui <Xinhui.Pan@xxxxxxx>; > airlied@xxxxxxxxx; daniel@xxxxxxxx; johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx; kuba@xxxxxxxxxx; > pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx; Limonciello, Mario <Mario.Limonciello@xxxxxxx>; > mdaenzer@xxxxxxxxxx; maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > tzimmermann@xxxxxxx; hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx; jingyuwang_vip@xxxxxxx; > Lazar, Lijo <Lijo.Lazar@xxxxxxx>; jim.cromie@xxxxxxxxx; > bellosilicio@xxxxxxxxx; andrealmeid@xxxxxxxxxx; trix@xxxxxxxxxx; > jsg@xxxxxxxxx; arnd@xxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux- > acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dri- > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 1/9] drivers core: Add support for Wifi band RF > mitigations > > > The wbrf_supported_producer and wbrf_supported_consumer APIs seem > > unnecessary for the generic implementation. > > I'm happy with these, once the description is corrected. As i said in another > comment, 'can' should be replaced with 'should'. The device itself knows if it > can, only the core knows if it should, based on the policy of if actions need to > be taken, and there are both providers and consumers registered with the > core. Sure, will update that in V7. Evan > > Andrew
