Hi, Dear etnaviv folks
Would you like to review this cleanup patch set ?
I am asking because I'm wondering that
if I should re-spin my other patch from the code base
which *with* this series applied or from the code base
*without* this series applied.
I think this series looks fine, is it acceptable?
On 2023/6/23 18:08, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
From: Sui Jingfeng <suijingfeng@xxxxxxxxxxx>
No functional change.
Sui Jingfeng (8):
drm/etnaviv: Using the size_t variable to store the number of pages
drm/etnaviv: Using the unsigned int type to count the number of pages
drm/etnaviv: Drop the second argument of the etnaviv_gem_new_impl()
drm/etnaviv: Remove surplus else after return
drm/etnaviv: Keep the curly brace aligned
drm/etnaviv: No indentation by double tabs
drm/etnaviv: Add dedicated functions to create and destroy platform
device
drm/etnaviv: Add a helper to get a pointer to the first available node
drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_drv.c | 100 +++++++++++++-------
drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_gem.c | 14 +--
drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_gem_prime.c | 7 +-
3 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
