Re: [PATCH] drm/panel: nt36523: fix parameter check in nt36523_probe()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Make IS_ERR() judge the mipi_dsi_device_register_full() function return

Would the term “return value” be relevant here?

Would you like to improve this change description also according to
review comments from other patches?


How do you think about to add the tag “Fixes” because of a desirable
source code adjustment?


Would a subject like “[PATCH v2] drm/panel: nt36523: Fix an error check in nt36523_probe()
be more appropriate?

Regards,
Markus




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux