On 24/06/2023 15:48, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On 24/06/2023 03:41, Marijn Suijten wrote: >> Document availability of the 14nm DSI PHY on SM6125. >> >> Signed-off-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-14nm.yaml | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-14nm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-14nm.yaml >> index a43e11d3b00d..60b590f21138 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-14nm.yaml >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-14nm.yaml >> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ properties: >> - qcom,dsi-phy-14nm >> - qcom,dsi-phy-14nm-2290 >> - qcom,dsi-phy-14nm-660 >> + - qcom,dsi-phy-14nm-6125 > > Should we start using standard scheme, so "qcom,sm6125-dsi-phy-14nm" ? I guess the earlier the better. Best regards, Krzysztof
