On 6/23/2023 1:28 PM, Marijn Suijten wrote:
On 2023-06-23 14:37:12, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
<snip>
In fact I asked to make it 0xf00 + 0x10 or 0xf80 + 0x10 to also cover
the CTL registers, but that change didn't make it through. 0x29c is an
arbitrary number that I have no clue what it was based on.
This should have been NAKed. or at least TODOed.
As usual ;) - add new features first, fix the fundamentals... later?
- Marijn
I think you yourself found out that this was not an arbitary number but
we atleast wanted to cover the full encoder set.
So fundamentals are always sound sometimes understanding is not ;)
