We changed the semantics for this in: e761cc20946a ("drm/display/dp_mst: Handle old/new payload states in drm_dp_remove_payload()") But I totally forgot to update this properly in nouveau. So, let's do that. Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@xxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c index 5bb777ff13130..1637e08b548c2 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c @@ -909,15 +909,19 @@ nv50_msto_prepare(struct drm_atomic_state *state, struct nouveau_drm *drm = nouveau_drm(msto->encoder.dev); struct nv50_mstc *mstc = msto->mstc; struct nv50_mstm *mstm = mstc->mstm; - struct drm_dp_mst_atomic_payload *payload; + struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state *old_mst_state; + struct drm_dp_mst_atomic_payload *payload, *old_payload; NV_ATOMIC(drm, "%s: msto prepare\n", msto->encoder.name); + old_mst_state = drm_atomic_get_old_mst_topology_state(state, mgr); + payload = drm_atomic_get_mst_payload_state(mst_state, mstc->port); + old_payload = drm_atomic_get_mst_payload_state(old_mst_state, mstc->port); // TODO: Figure out if we want to do a better job of handling VCPI allocation failures here? if (msto->disabled) { - drm_dp_remove_payload(mgr, mst_state, payload, payload); + drm_dp_remove_payload(mgr, mst_state, old_payload, payload); nvif_outp_dp_mst_vcpi(&mstm->outp->outp, msto->head->base.index, 0, 0, 0, 0); } else { -- 2.40.1