It is impossible to pass the PAT setting when sharing the fd.
Thanks Carl From: Yang, Fei <fei.yang@xxxxxxxxx> > Hi Carl, > >>>> besides this, ask a dumb question. >>>> How we retrieve the pat_index from a shared resource though dma_buf fd? >>>> maybe we need to know whether it could be CPU cached if we want map it. >>>> Of course, looks there are no real usage to access it though CPU. >>>> Just use it directly without any pat related options ? >>> >>> I am not understanding. Do you want to ask the PAT table to the driver? Are >>> you referring to the CPU PAT index? >>> >>> In any case, if I understood correctly, you don't necessarily always need to >>> set the PAT options and the cache options will fall into the default values. >>> >>> Please let me know if I haven't answered the question. >>> >> >> If mesa create a resource , then use DRM_IOCTL_PRIME_HANDLE_TO_FD convert it to a dma fd. >> Then share it to media, media use DRM_IOCTL_PRIME_FD_TO_HANDLE convert it to a gem bo. >> But media does not know the PAT index , because mesa create it and set it. >> So, if media want to call DRM_IOCTL_I915_GEM_MMAP_OFFSET, media does not know whether it could be WB. > > That's a good point. To be honest I am not really sure how this > is handled. > > Fei, Jordan? Do you have suggestion here? Is it possible to pass the PAT setting when sharing the fd? Or perhaps we should have kept the get_caching ioctl functional? Joonas, could you chime in here? > Andi |