Re: [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915/uc/gsc: extract release and security versions from the gsc binary

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2023-05-26 at 18:27 -0700, Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele wrote:
> <snip>
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_gsc_meu_headers.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_gsc_meu_headers.h
> > > index d55a66202576..8bce2b8aed84 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_gsc_meu_headers.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_gsc_meu_headers.h
alan:snip

> > alan: structure layout seems unnecessarily repetitive... why not ->
> > struct partition_info {
> > 	u32 offset;
> > 	u32 size;
> > };
> > struct intel_gsc_layout_pointers {
> > 	u8 rom_bypass_vector[16];
> > 	...
> > 	struct partition_info datap;
> > 	struct partition_info bootregion[5];
> > 	struct partition_info trace;
> > }__packed;
> > 
> 
> I've just realized that I didn't reply to this comment. The specs have 
> the structure defined that way, so I tried to keep a 1:1 match like we 
> usually do. I think switching to a partition_info structure is ok, but 
> I'll avoid the array because the GSC partition are 1-based, which could 
> cause confusion (i.e. partition boot1 would be bootregion[0]).
alan: sure - that's fine - let's stick to align with the spec definitions





[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux