Re: [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915/uc/gsc: Add a gsc_info debugfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 5/26/2023 3:57 PM, Teres Alexis, Alan Previn wrote:
On Fri, 2023-05-05 at 09:04 -0700, Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele wrote:
Add a new debugfs to dump information about the GSC. This includes:
alan:snip
Actually everything looks good except for a couple of questions + asks - hope we can close on this patch in next rev.

- the FW path and SW tracking status;
- the release, security and compatibility versions;
- the HECI1 status registers.

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_gsc_fw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_gsc_fw.c
index 0b6dcd982b14..3014e982aab2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_gsc_fw.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_gsc_fw.c
@@ -12,36 +12,31 @@
  #include "intel_gsc_fw.h"
  #include "intel_gsc_meu_headers.h"
  #include "intel_gsc_uc_heci_cmd_submit.h"
-
-#define GSC_FW_STATUS_REG			_MMIO(0x116C40)
-#define GSC_FW_CURRENT_STATE			REG_GENMASK(3, 0)
-#define   GSC_FW_CURRENT_STATE_RESET		0
-#define   GSC_FW_PROXY_STATE_NORMAL		5
-#define GSC_FW_INIT_COMPLETE_BIT		REG_BIT(9)
+#include "i915_reg.h"
alan:snip
alan: btw, just to be consistent with other top-level "intel_foo_is..." checking functions,
why don't we take the runtime wakeref inside the following functions and make it easier for any callers?
(just like what we do for "intel_huc_is_authenticated"):
     static bool gsc_is_in_reset(struct intel_uncore *uncore)
     bool intel_gsc_uc_fw_proxy_init_done(struct intel_gsc_uc *gsc)
     bool intel_gsc_uc_fw_init_done(struct intel_gsc_uc *gsc)

The idea was that we shouldn't check the FW status if we're not planning to do something with it, in which case we should already have a wakeref. HuC is a special case because userspace can query that when the HW is idle. This said, I have nothing against adding an extra wakeref , but I don't think it should be in this patch.



diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_gsc_uc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_gsc_uc.c
index 2ae693b01b49..5475e95d61c6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_gsc_uc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_gsc_uc.c
@@ -9,8 +9,9 @@
  #include "gt/intel_gt_print.h"
  #include "intel_gsc_uc.h"
alan: nit: not this patch's fault, alphabetically, intel_gsc_uc.h is after intel_gsc_proxy.h

will fix

  #include "intel_gsc_fw.h"
-#include "i915_drv.h"
  #include "intel_gsc_proxy.h"
+#include "i915_drv.h"
+#include "i915_reg.h"
static void gsc_work(struct work_struct *work)
  {
@@ -301,3 +302,46 @@ void intel_gsc_uc_load_start(struct intel_gsc_uc *gsc)
   	queue_work(gsc->wq, &gsc->work);
  }
+
alan: btw, why are we putting intel_gsc_uc_load_status in intel_gsc_uc.c if the only caller is gsc_uc's debugfs?
why not just make it a static in there? unless u plan to call it from "err_print_uc" - then can we add that in next rev?

I do indeed plan to follow up and add this to the error state, but I'll do that as a separate patch as I also want to add the GSC logs to the error state at the same time.


+void intel_gsc_uc_load_status(struct intel_gsc_uc *gsc, struct drm_printer *p)
+{
+	struct intel_gt *gt = gsc_uc_to_gt(gsc);
+	struct intel_uncore *uncore = gt->uncore;
+	intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
+
+	if (!intel_gsc_uc_is_supported(gsc)) {
alan: this was already checked in caller so we'll never get here. i think we should remove the check in the caller, let below msg appear.

I did the same as what we do for GuC and HuC. I'd prefer to be consistent in behavior with those.

+		drm_printf(p, "GSC not supported\n");
+		return;
+	}
alan:snip



+			drm_printf(p, "HECI1 FWSTST%u = 0x%08x\n", i, status);
alan:nit: do you we could add those additional shim regs? (seemed useful in recent offline debugs).

Agreed that it would be useful; I'll try to get a complete list from arch and/or the GSC FW team. Are you ok if we go ahead with this in the meantime?

alan:snip

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_gsc_uc_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_gsc_uc_debugfs.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..da9f96b72291
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_gsc_uc_debugfs.c
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
+/*
+ * Copyright © 2020 Intel Corporation
alan:2023?

D'oh!

Daniele


alan:snip

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_gsc_uc_debugfs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_gsc_uc_debugfs.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..c405e5574253
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_gsc_uc_debugfs.h
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */
+/*
+ * Copyright © 2020 Intel Corporation
alan:2023?
alan:snip

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_huc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_huc.c
alan:snip

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc_debugfs.c
index 2f93cc4e408a..6d541c866edb 100644
alan:snip







[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux