On 5/23/2023 12:30 PM, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
On 5/23/2023 12:23 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Tue, 23 May 2023 at 22:14, Abhinav Kumar
<quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 5/23/2023 7:36 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On 23/05/2023 10:31, Neil Armstrong wrote:
On 23/05/2023 09:20, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Tue, 23 May 2023 at 04:58, Abhinav Kumar
<quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 5/18/2023 7:38 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
Rework dpu_encoder initialization code, simplifying calling
sequences
and separating common init parts.
Changes since v1:
- Withdrawn two pathes for a later consideration
- Changed dpu_encoder_phys_init() to return void (Abhinav)
- Added small simplifications of dpu_encoder_phys_cmd_init() and
dpu_encoder_phys_wb_init()
I had previously given these comments on the cover letter of v1, so
giving it again.
Please mention that your series was made on top of
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/116530/.
Figured it out when I tried to apply it to my branch to test.
I had tested v1, and between v1 and v2 i only see very trivial
change,
so i think its okay to retain:
Tested-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx> # sc7280
Unfortunately patchwork ignores tags sent in the cover letter thread.
But b4 does with -t option to b4 shazam or b4 am
Yes. But b4 doesn't append Patchwork headers.
If thats the case, either the author can add them to the patches
manually like we do sometimes for R-b tags OR I will go ahead and add it
one by one for every patch now.
I'd prefer either to have a single T-B on the latest patch on the
series, or a pile of replies with T-B tags. Thank you (for the testing
and for providing the feedback).
If we ever switch from git-pw to b4, this requirement will be lifted.
Latest patch means, the last one in the series?
In this case, that would look a bit odd as that one just removes a temp
variable.
I will provide it on all the patches by tomorrow.
This patch doesnt apply cleanly on msm-next-lumag now. Do you have to
rebase this? Otherwise please list the dependency on top of msm-next-lumag.
Let me know what you prefer.
Neil
Dmitry Baryshkov (7):
drm/msm/dpu: merge dpu_encoder_init() and dpu_encoder_setup()
drm/msm/dpu: separate common function to init physical encoder
drm/msm/dpu: drop duplicated intf/wb indices from encoder
structs
drm/msm/dpu: inline dpu_encoder_get_wb()
drm/msm/dpu: call dpu_rm_get_intf() from
dpu_encoder_get_intf()
drm/msm/dpu: drop temp variable from
dpu_encoder_phys_cmd_init()
drm/msm/dpu: simplify dpu_encoder_phys_wb_init()
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c | 178
++++++++----------
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.h | 14 +-
.../gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys.h | 15 +-
.../drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_cmd.c | 35 ++--
.../drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_vid.c | 19 +-
.../drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder_phys_wb.c | 35 +---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_kms.c | 87 ++++-----
7 files changed, 140 insertions(+), 243 deletions(-)
