On 30/05/2023 15:38, Raphael Gallais-Pou wrote: > > On 5/30/23 15:30, Alexandre TORGUE wrote: >> On 5/30/23 14:27, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> On Mon, 29 May 2023 11:13:57 +0200, Raphael Gallais-Pou wrote: >>>> "#address-cells" and "#size-cells" are two properties that are not >>>> mandatory. For instance, the DSI could refer to a bridge outside the scope >>>> of the node rather than include a 'panel@0' subnode. By doing so, address >>>> and size fields become then unnecessary, creating a warning at build time. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Raphael Gallais-Pou <raphael.gallais-pou@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@xxxxxxx> >>>> --- >>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/st,stm32-dsi.yaml | 2 -- >>>> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) >>>> >>> >>> Running 'make dtbs_check' with the schema in this patch gives the >>> following warnings. Consider if they are expected or the schema is >>> incorrect. These may not be new warnings >> I checked it before merging the series on stm32-next tree. I didn't get this >> error. I didn't check commit per commit. >> >> Do you get this error after merging the whole series ? > > > I think this is because of the order of the patches within the serie. The patch > correcting the yaml is before those modifying the device-trees. This could > explain warnings rise up when checking patch per patch. However I did not get > any errors on top of the whole serie. Yeah. Ignore the report if you tested it by yourself. Best regards, Krzysztof
