On 18/05/2023 22:41, Marijn Suijten wrote:
On 2023-04-28 15:36:46, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
Since GC and IGC masks have now been dropped DSPP_MSM8998_MASK
is same as DSPP_SC7180_MASK. Since DSPP_SC7180_MASK is used more
is *the* same
And, I think, a comma is missing before DSPP_MSM8998_MASK.
Note: since the English language is not native for most of the
developers, I usually don't nitpick on these issues provided we can
understand the message without too much trouble (and the mistake doesn't
stand out aloud, begging for it to be fixed).
I will fix missing articles when applying, if I don't forget.
than DSPP_MSM8998_MASK, lets drop the latter.
Signed-off-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_3_0_msm8998.h | 4 ++--
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c | 2 --
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_3_0_msm8998.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_3_0_msm8998.h
index bdcd554fc8a8..a4679f72a262 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_3_0_msm8998.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_3_0_msm8998.h
@@ -127,9 +127,9 @@ static const struct dpu_pingpong_cfg msm8998_pp[] = {
};
static const struct dpu_dspp_cfg msm8998_dspp[] = {
- DSPP_BLK("dspp_0", DSPP_0, 0x54000, DSPP_MSM8998_MASK,
+ DSPP_BLK("dspp_0", DSPP_0, 0x54000, DSPP_SC7180_MASK,
&msm8998_dspp_sblk),
- DSPP_BLK("dspp_1", DSPP_1, 0x56000, DSPP_MSM8998_MASK,
+ DSPP_BLK("dspp_1", DSPP_1, 0x56000, DSPP_SC7180_MASK,
&msm8998_dspp_sblk),
};
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
index 791a6fc8bdbf..efd466f6122b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
@@ -91,8 +91,6 @@
#define MERGE_3D_SM8150_MASK (0)
-#define DSPP_MSM8998_MASK BIT(DPU_DSPP_PCC)
-
#define DSPP_SC7180_MASK BIT(DPU_DSPP_PCC)
Should we add preliminary parenthesis around this?
- Marijn
#define INTF_SDM845_MASK (0)
--
2.40.1
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
