On 17/05/2023 10:29, Paulo Pavacic wrote: > Hello, > > If I understood you correctly you'd prefer it to be named > fannal,c3004.yaml? This is what I wrote: "Judging by compatible, this should be fannal,c3004.yaml" > My logic is that if more panels were to be added that > means that each one would have yaml files that would look exactly the > same with the same user. It's not a big deal. Although anyway why would other panels have exactly the same supplies and all other properties? BTW, you miss there supply. Best regards, Krzysztof
