On 5/15/2023 1:07 PM, Marijn Suijten wrote:
On 2023-05-15 11:20:02, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
On 5/14/2023 2:39 PM, Marijn Suijten wrote:
DSC*, and mention 1.1 explicitly (since this skips the 1.2 blocks, while
the series is clearly aimed at 1.1...). This was done for the DSC 1.2
HW block patch after all.
in catalog -> to catalog
But it's just two platforms, you can fit MSM8998 and SC8180X in the
title.
On 2023-05-12 11:00:16, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
From: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
There are some platforms has DSC blocks but it is not declared at catalog.
Some platforms have DSC blocks which have not yet been declared in the
catalog.*
For completeness, this patch adds DSC blocks for platforms which missed
them.
Drop "this patch":
Complete DSC 1.1 support for all platforms by adding the missing
blocks to MSM8998 and SC8180X.
Signed-off-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_3_0_msm8998.h | 7 +++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_5_1_sc8180x.h | 11 +++++++++++
How about SC7180, and any other DPU 6.x revision?
Will let kuogee respond to the other nits. There is no DSC in sc7180 /
sm6115 / qcm2290. So this patch is complete.
Thank you for checking as I didn't have the DTS close (and it seems
SC7180 would have supported this, but no). I did check other SoCs in
the DPU 6.x range that are currently floating in my tree and on the
list, which do need their DSC 1.1 block added (both a single block at
0x81000 downstream, 0x80000 upstream), if you can in a resend Konrad:
DPU 6.4 in SM6350: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230411-topic-straitlagoon_mdss-v3-6-9837d6b3516d@xxxxxxxxxx/
DPU 6.9 in SM6375: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230411-topic-straitlagoon_mdss-v3-8-9837d6b3516d@xxxxxxxxxx/
If these are still on the list, can Konrad add them to his change as
that way his catalog change will be complete? Otherwise I would prefer
to add them in a follow up change because marking this change as
dependent on a catalog change which adds a new chipset is not right.
Thanks!
- Marijn
