On 5/10/2023 3:46 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Kuogee Hsieh (2023-05-10 13:31:05)
Intrenal_hpd is referenced by event thread but set by drm bridge callback
context. Add mutex to protect internal_hpd to avoid conflicts between
threads.
Signed-off-by: Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
This patch looks completely unnecessary. How can dp_bridge_hpd_enable()
be called at the same time that dp_bridge_hpd_disable() is called or
dp_bridge_hpd_notify() is called? Isn't there locking or ordering at a
higher layer?
Ack. We can drop this patch because we are protected by
bridge->hpd_mutex in drm_bridge_hpd_enable() / drm_bridge_hpd_disable ()
and drm_bridge_hpd_notify().
