Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] drm/msm/dpu: Add DPU_INTF_DATA_COMPRESS feature flag

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 5/8/2023 4:08 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On 09/05/2023 00:46, Jessica Zhang wrote:


On 5/7/2023 9:00 AM, Marijn Suijten wrote:
On 2023-05-05 14:23:50, Jessica Zhang wrote:
Add DATA_COMPRESS feature flag to DPU INTF block.

In DPU 7.x and later, DSC/DCE enablement registers have been moved from
PINGPONG to INTF.

As core_rev (and related macros) was removed from the dpu_kms struct, the most straightforward way to indicate the presence of this register would be
to have a feature flag.

Irrelevant.  Even though core_rev was still in mainline until recently,
we always hardcoded the features in the catalog and only used core_rev
to select a dpu_mdss_cfg catalog entry.  There is no "if version >= X
then enable feature Y" logic, this manually-enabled feature flag is the
only, correct way to do it.

Hi Marijn,

Understood. FWIW, if we do find more register bit-level differences between HW versions in the future, it might make more sense to keep the HW catalog small and bring core_rev back, rather than keep adding these kinds of small differences to caps.

Let's see how it goes. Abhinav suggested that there might be feature differences inside the DPU generations (and even inside the single DPU major/minor combo). So I'm not sure what core_rev will bring us.


It allows us to have if MDSS_REV() checks which are convenient for some calculations / bit programming which we dont want to expose in the catalog as they cannot be classified as a hw cap as such or atleast we dont want them to be classified as such.

Let's land the platforms which are ready (or if there is anything close to be submitted). I'll post the next proposal for the catalog cleanups close to -rc4, when the dust settles then we can have one or two weaks for the discussion and polishing.

I'd like to consider:
- inlining foo_BLK macros, if that makes adding new features easier
- reformat of clk_ctrls
- maybe reintroduction of per-generation feature masks instead of keeping them named after the random SoC - maybe a rework of mdss_irqs / INTFn_INTR. We already have this info in hw catalog.

Comments are appreciated.


I would say, lets wait for DSC to settle. Atleast the parts already on the list. Continuous rebase of features already on the list is becoming time consuming because of overlapping catalog reworks.



Thanks,

Jessica Zhang


Changes in v2:
- Changed has_data_compress dpu_cap to a DATA_COMPRESS INTF feature flag

Signed-off-by: Jessica Zhang <quic_jesszhan@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c | 2 +-
  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h | 2 ++
  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
index 7944481d0a33..c74051906d05 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@
  #define INTF_SC7180_MASK \
      (BIT(DPU_INTF_INPUT_CTRL) | BIT(DPU_INTF_TE) | BIT(DPU_INTF_STATUS_SUPPORTED))
-#define INTF_SC7280_MASK INTF_SC7180_MASK | BIT(DPU_DATA_HCTL_EN)
+#define INTF_SC7280_MASK INTF_SC7180_MASK | BIT(DPU_DATA_HCTL_EN) | BIT(DPU_INTF_DATA_COMPRESS)

Konrad: Your SM6350/SM6375 series v3 [1] switched from INTF_SC7180_MASK
to INTF_SC7280_MASK to enable HCTL on SM6375, but that will now
erroneously also receive this feature flag and write the new
DATA_COMPESS mask even if it's DPU 6.9 (< 7.x where it got added).

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/80b46fcb-d6d0-1998-c273-5401fa924c7d@xxxxxxxxxx/T/#u

Depending on who lands first, this flag should be split.

I still see value in inlining and removing these defines, though that
brings a host of other complexity.

- Marijn

  #define WB_SM8250_MASK (BIT(DPU_WB_LINE_MODE) | \
               BIT(DPU_WB_UBWC) | \
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h
index 4eda2cc847ef..01c65f940f2a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h
@@ -185,6 +185,7 @@ enum {
   * @DPU_DATA_HCTL_EN                Allows data to be transferred at different rate
   *                                  than video timing
   * @DPU_INTF_STATUS_SUPPORTED       INTF block has INTF_STATUS register + * @DPU_INTF_DATA_COMPRESS          INTF block has DATA_COMPRESS register
   * @DPU_INTF_MAX
   */
  enum {
@@ -192,6 +193,7 @@ enum {
      DPU_INTF_TE,
      DPU_DATA_HCTL_EN,
      DPU_INTF_STATUS_SUPPORTED,
+    DPU_INTF_DATA_COMPRESS,
      DPU_INTF_MAX
  };

--
2.40.1





[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux