On 07/05/2023 19:00, Marijn Suijten wrote:
On 2023-05-05 14:23:50, Jessica Zhang wrote:
Add DATA_COMPRESS feature flag to DPU INTF block.
In DPU 7.x and later, DSC/DCE enablement registers have been moved from
PINGPONG to INTF.
As core_rev (and related macros) was removed from the dpu_kms struct, the
most straightforward way to indicate the presence of this register would be
to have a feature flag.
Irrelevant. Even though core_rev was still in mainline until recently,
we always hardcoded the features in the catalog and only used core_rev
to select a dpu_mdss_cfg catalog entry. There is no "if version >= X
then enable feature Y" logic, this manually-enabled feature flag is the
only, correct way to do it.
Changes in v2:
- Changed has_data_compress dpu_cap to a DATA_COMPRESS INTF feature flag
Signed-off-by: Jessica Zhang <quic_jesszhan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h | 2 ++
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
index 7944481d0a33..c74051906d05 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@
#define INTF_SC7180_MASK \
(BIT(DPU_INTF_INPUT_CTRL) | BIT(DPU_INTF_TE) | BIT(DPU_INTF_STATUS_SUPPORTED))
-#define INTF_SC7280_MASK INTF_SC7180_MASK | BIT(DPU_DATA_HCTL_EN)
+#define INTF_SC7280_MASK INTF_SC7180_MASK | BIT(DPU_DATA_HCTL_EN) | BIT(DPU_INTF_DATA_COMPRESS)
Konrad: Your SM6350/SM6375 series v3 [1] switched from INTF_SC7180_MASK
to INTF_SC7280_MASK to enable HCTL on SM6375, but that will now
erroneously also receive this feature flag and write the new
DATA_COMPESS mask even if it's DPU 6.9 (< 7.x where it got added).
Yeah, that's why I had the idea of including at least the DPU major in
the mask name.
It looks like we should enable DPU_DATA_HCTL_EN at least for
sm8150/sm8250 (and other DPU 6.x) too. I am not sure if it is present on
sdm845.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/80b46fcb-d6d0-1998-c273-5401fa924c7d@xxxxxxxxxx/T/#u
Depending on who lands first, this flag should be split.
I still see value in inlining and removing these defines, though that
brings a host of other complexity.
- Marijn
#define WB_SM8250_MASK (BIT(DPU_WB_LINE_MODE) | \
BIT(DPU_WB_UBWC) | \
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h
index 4eda2cc847ef..01c65f940f2a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.h
@@ -185,6 +185,7 @@ enum {
* @DPU_DATA_HCTL_EN Allows data to be transferred at different rate
* than video timing
* @DPU_INTF_STATUS_SUPPORTED INTF block has INTF_STATUS register
+ * @DPU_INTF_DATA_COMPRESS INTF block has DATA_COMPRESS register
* @DPU_INTF_MAX
*/
enum {
@@ -192,6 +193,7 @@ enum {
DPU_INTF_TE,
DPU_DATA_HCTL_EN,
DPU_INTF_STATUS_SUPPORTED,
+ DPU_INTF_DATA_COMPRESS,
DPU_INTF_MAX
};
--
2.40.1
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
