On 03/05/2023 00:02, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
At legacy chipsets, it required DPU_PINGPONG_DSC bit be set to indicate pingpong ops functions are required to complete DSC data path setup if this chipset has DSC hardware block presented. This patch add DPU_PINGPONG_DSC bit to both PP_BLK and PP_BLK_TE marcos if it has DSC hardware block presented. Signed-off-by: Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- .../drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_3_0_msm8998.h | 12 +++++----- .../gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_4_0_sdm845.h | 8 +++---- .../gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_5_0_sm8150.h | 26 ++++++++++------------ .../drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_5_1_sc8180x.h | 24 ++++++++++---------- .../gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_6_0_sm8250.h | 26 ++++++++++------------ .../gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_6_2_sc7180.h | 4 ++-- .../gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_6_3_sm6115.h | 2 +- .../drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_6_5_qcm2290.h | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c | 8 +++---- 9 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_3_0_msm8998.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_3_0_msm8998.h index 17f821c..b7cd746 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_3_0_msm8998.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_3_0_msm8998.h @@ -112,16 +112,16 @@ static const struct dpu_lm_cfg msm8998_lm[] = { };static const struct dpu_pingpong_cfg msm8998_pp[] = {- PP_BLK_TE("pingpong_0", PINGPONG_0, 0x70000, 0, sdm845_pp_sblk_te, - DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 8), + PP_BLK_TE("pingpong_0", PINGPONG_0, 0x70000, BIT(DPU_PINGPONG_DSC), 0, + sdm845_pp_sblk_te, DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 8), DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 12)), - PP_BLK_TE("pingpong_1", PINGPONG_1, 0x70800, 0, sdm845_pp_sblk_te, - DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 9), + PP_BLK_TE("pingpong_1", PINGPONG_1, 0x70800, BIT(DPU_PINGPONG_DSC), 0, + sdm845_pp_sblk_te, DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 9), DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 13)), - PP_BLK("pingpong_2", PINGPONG_2, 0x71000, 0, sdm845_pp_sblk, + PP_BLK("pingpong_2", PINGPONG_2, 0x71000, 0, 0, sdm845_pp_sblk, DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 10), DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 14)), - PP_BLK("pingpong_3", PINGPONG_3, 0x71800, 0, sdm845_pp_sblk, + PP_BLK("pingpong_3", PINGPONG_3, 0x71800, 0, 0, sdm845_pp_sblk, DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 11), DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 15)),
Just to doublecheck: why don't we have DPU_PINGPONG_DSC for PP_3/_4? We do have them on sdm845. Is it because we should not use DSC with thos PINGPONG blocks?
}; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_4_0_sdm845.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_4_0_sdm845.h index ceca741..8888bd9 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_4_0_sdm845.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_4_0_sdm845.h @@ -110,16 +110,16 @@ static const struct dpu_lm_cfg sdm845_lm[] = { };static const struct dpu_pingpong_cfg sdm845_pp[] = {- PP_BLK_TE("pingpong_0", PINGPONG_0, 0x70000, 0, sdm845_pp_sblk_te, + PP_BLK_TE("pingpong_0", PINGPONG_0, 0x70000, BIT(DPU_PINGPONG_DSC), 0, sdm845_pp_sblk_te, DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 8), DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 12)), - PP_BLK_TE("pingpong_1", PINGPONG_1, 0x70800, 0, sdm845_pp_sblk_te, + PP_BLK_TE("pingpong_1", PINGPONG_1, 0x70800, BIT(DPU_PINGPONG_DSC), 0, sdm845_pp_sblk_te, DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 9), DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 13)), - PP_BLK("pingpong_2", PINGPONG_2, 0x71000, 0, sdm845_pp_sblk, + PP_BLK("pingpong_2", PINGPONG_2, 0x71000, BIT(DPU_PINGPONG_DSC), 0, sdm845_pp_sblk, DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 10), DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 14)), - PP_BLK("pingpong_3", PINGPONG_3, 0x71800, 0, sdm845_pp_sblk, + PP_BLK("pingpong_3", PINGPONG_3, 0x71800, BIT(DPU_PINGPONG_DSC), 0, sdm845_pp_sblk, DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 11), DPU_IRQ_IDX(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR, 15)),
[skipped the rest, looks good to me] -- With best wishes Dmitry
