On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 4:16 PM Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > This patch seems to be a part of a series without being marked as such, > > The mentioned patch affects only a single function implementation. > > > > this causes issues when importing this patch with maintainer tools > > like b4 which automatically pull in the entire series and not > > just the specific patch. > > It is a pity that there are special technical difficulties. > > > > Either label the patch as being part of a series ( [PATCH 1/XX] ), > > Further software modules were similarly affected. > > See also: > Reconsidering pointer dereferences before null pointer checks (with SmPL) > https://lore.kernel.org/cocci/1a11455f-ab57-dce0-1677-6beb8492a257@xxxxxx/ > https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/cocci/2023-04/msg00021.html > > > > or submit it separately. > > I thought that I did that (in principle). You can have a look at LKML for the email message-id to see the whole thread of patches. https://lore.kernel.org/all/14636275-4d26-d639-5f6e-293fc6d1c4c6@xxxxxx/#r Or https://lore.kernel.org/all/$MSG_ID Fix the email Sign-off email != Sender email issue, resubmit and I'll be able to apply this.
