Le jeu. 20 avr. 2023 à 01:18, Dmitry Baryshkov
<dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
>
> On 19/04/2023 17:41, Arnaud Vrac wrote:
> > This avoids using lm blocks that support DSPP when not needed, to
> > keep those resources available.
>
> This will break some of the platforms. Consider qcm2290 which has a
> single LM with DSPP. So, _dpu_rm_check_lm_and_get_connected_blks should
> be performed in two steps: first skip non-DSPP-enabled LMs when DSPP is
> not required. Then, if the LM (pair) is not found, look for any suitable
> LM(pair).
Good point, I'll add the change.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Arnaud Vrac <avrac@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_rm.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_rm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_rm.c
> > index f4dda88a73f7d..4b393d46c743f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_rm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_rm.c
> > @@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ static bool _dpu_rm_check_lm_and_get_connected_blks(struct dpu_rm *rm,
> > *pp_idx = idx;
> >
> > if (!reqs->topology.num_dspp)
> > - return true;
> > + return !lm_cfg->dspp;
> >
> > idx = lm_cfg->dspp - DSPP_0;
> > if (idx < 0 || idx >= ARRAY_SIZE(rm->dspp_blks)) {
> >
>
> --
> With best wishes
> Dmitry
>
