Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] drm/tests: Add test cases for drm_rect_calc_vscale()

[Maíra Canal <mcanal@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 4/6/23 08:53, Arthur Grillo wrote:
> Insert parameterized test for the drm_rect_calc_vscale() to ensure
> correctness and prevent future regressions. Besides the test for the
> usual case, tests the exceptions.
>
> It uses the same struct from drm_rect_calc_hscale().
>
> Signed-off-by: Arthur Grillo <arthurgrillo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_rect_test.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 59 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_rect_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_rect_test.c
> index 44150545c1bc..a1fd9b2c5128 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_rect_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_rect_test.c
> @@ -414,6 +414,64 @@ static void drm_test_rect_calc_hscale(struct kunit *test)
>   	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, scaling_factor, params->expected_scaling_factor);
>   }
>   
> +static const struct drm_rect_scale_case drm_rect_vscale_cases[] = {
> +	{
> +		.name = "normal use",
> +		.src = DRM_RECT_INIT(0, 0, 0, 2 << 16),
> +		.dst = DRM_RECT_INIT(0, 0, 0, 1 << 16),
> +		.min_range = 0, .max_range = INT_MAX,
> +		.expected_scaling_factor = 2,
> +	},
> +	{
> +		.name = "out of max range",
> +		.src = DRM_RECT_INIT(0, 0, 0, 10 << 16),
> +		.dst = DRM_RECT_INIT(0, 0, 0, 1 << 16),
> +		.min_range = 3, .max_range = 5,
> +		.expected_scaling_factor = -ERANGE,
> +	},
> +	{
> +		.name = "out of min range",
> +		.src = DRM_RECT_INIT(0, 0, 0, 2 << 16),
> +		.dst = DRM_RECT_INIT(0, 0, 0, 1 << 16),
> +		.min_range = 3, .max_range = 5,
> +		.expected_scaling_factor = -ERANGE,
> +	},
> +	{
> +		.name = "zero dst height",
> +		.src = DRM_RECT_INIT(0, 0, 0, 2 << 16),
> +		.dst = DRM_RECT_INIT(0, 0, 0, 0 << 16),
> +		.min_range = 0, .max_range = INT_MAX,
> +		.expected_scaling_factor = 0,
> +	},
> +	{
> +		.name = "negative src height",
> +		.src = DRM_RECT_INIT(0, 0, 0, -(1 << 16)),
> +		.dst = DRM_RECT_INIT(0, 0, 0, 1 << 16),
> +		.min_range = 0, .max_range = INT_MAX,
> +		.expected_scaling_factor = -EINVAL,
> +	},
> +	{
> +		.name = "negative dst height",
> +		.src = DRM_RECT_INIT(0, 0, 0, 1 << 16),
> +		.dst = DRM_RECT_INIT(0, 0, 0, -(1 << 16)),
> +		.min_range = 0, .max_range = INT_MAX,
> +		.expected_scaling_factor = -EINVAL,
> +	},
> +};
> +

Would it possible to use the same parameter array for vscale and hscale?

Best Regards,
- Maíra Canal

> +KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM(drm_rect_vscale, drm_rect_vscale_cases, drm_rect_scale_case_desc);
> +
> +static void drm_test_rect_calc_vscale(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +	const struct drm_rect_scale_case *params = test->param_value;
> +	int scaling_factor;
> +
> +	scaling_factor = drm_rect_calc_vscale(&params->src, &params->dst,
> +					      params->min_range, params->max_range);
> +
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, scaling_factor, params->expected_scaling_factor);
> +}
> +
>   static struct kunit_case drm_rect_tests[] = {
>   	KUNIT_CASE(drm_test_rect_clip_scaled_div_by_zero),
>   	KUNIT_CASE(drm_test_rect_clip_scaled_not_clipped),
> @@ -421,6 +479,7 @@ static struct kunit_case drm_rect_tests[] = {
>   	KUNIT_CASE(drm_test_rect_clip_scaled_signed_vs_unsigned),
>   	KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(drm_test_rect_intersect, drm_rect_intersect_gen_params),
>   	KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(drm_test_rect_calc_hscale, drm_rect_hscale_gen_params),
> +	KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(drm_test_rect_calc_vscale, drm_rect_vscale_gen_params),
>   	{ }
>   };
>