Hi Francesco, On 14-Apr-23 14:00, Francesco Dolcini wrote: > Hello Aradhya, > > On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 01:19:38PM +0530, Aradhya Bhatia wrote: >> On 30-Mar-23 22:47, Francesco Dolcini wrote: >>> Hello, >>> chiming in in this *old* email thread. >>> >>> Adding in copy a few more *@ti.com people recently involved in other tidss >>> changes [1] >>> >>> >>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230125113529.13952-1-a-bhatia1@xxxxxx/ >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 11:50:30AM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote: >>>> On Tue, 1 Dec 2020 17:48:28 +0530 >>>> Nikhil Devshatwar <nikhil.nd@xxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Remove the old code to iterate over the bridge chain, as this is >>>>> already done by the framework. >>>>> The bridge state should have the negotiated bus format and flags. >>>>> Use these from the bridge's state. >>>>> If the bridge does not support format negotiation, error out >>>>> and fail. >>>> >>>> That'd be even better if you implement the bridge interface instead of >>>> the encoder one so we can get rid of the encoder_{helper}_funcs and use >>>> drm_simple_encoder_init(). >>> >>> Did anything happened on this old discussion? I was working on a very >>> similar change and after a while I realized about this thread. >>> >> Nikhil has moved on from TI. >> >> I will be taking up this patch series and implement the changes >> requested. > Great! > > What I was working on is really about having the media bus format taken > from the closest bridge, this is really required for proper functionality > when the display is connected through a bridge. I agree with you there. The current code will not work well when the media bus format required by the final sink is not same as the one tidss needs to output. > > This [1] is what I was working on before realizing about this specific > patch here, in case you want to have a look. > > Please keep me in CC, I can test/review patches. Thank you! Will do. =) Regards Aradhya
