Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 10:52:48 +0200 The address of a data structure member was determined before a corresponding null pointer check in the implementation of the function “amdgpu_ras_interrupt_dispatch”. Thus avoid the risk for undefined behaviour by moving the assignment for the variable “data” behind the null pointer check. This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software. Fixes: c030f2e4166c3f5597c7e7a70bcd9ab383695de4 ("drm/amdgpu: add amdgpu_ras.c to support ras (v2)") Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c index 4069bce9479f..a920c7888d07 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras.c @@ -1730,11 +1730,12 @@ int amdgpu_ras_interrupt_dispatch(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct ras_dispatch_if *info) { struct ras_manager *obj = amdgpu_ras_find_obj(adev, &info->head); - struct ras_ih_data *data = &obj->ih_data; + struct ras_ih_data *data; if (!obj) return -EINVAL; + data = &obj->ih_data; if (data->inuse == 0) return 0; -- 2.40.0