Re: [PATCH 03/15] drm/nouveau: use mdelay instead of large udelay constants

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 12:22:40AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> ARM cannot handle udelay for more than 2 miliseconds, so we
                                           ^^^^

                                 There's l missing here.

> should use mdelay instead for those.

Could this be handled inside ARM udelay() instead? Probably most of the
delay values are compile-time constants.

A.
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux