Applied to drm-misc-next, sorry for the trouble.
Regards,
Qiang
On Wed, Apr 5, 2023 at 3:28 AM Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 04:17:33PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> > On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 at 08:13, <yq882255@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Qiang Yu <yuq825@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Upstream has reverted the dependant commit
> > > df622729ddbf ("drm/scheduler: track GPU active time per entity""),
> > > but this patchset has been pushed to drm-misc-next which still
> > > has that commit. To avoid other branch build fail after merge
> > > drm-misc-next, just revert the lima patchset on drm-misc-next too.
> > >
> >
> > The bug/revert is unfortunate, although we better keep the build clean
> > or Linus will go bananas ^_^
> >
> > Fwiw for the series:
> > Acked-by: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Can you (eitehr of you really) please push asap and make sure this doesn't
> miss the last drm-misc-next pull (-rc6 is this w/e)? Otherwise we'll have
> a bit a mess.
> -Daniel
>
> >
> > HTH
> > -Emil
>
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> http://blog.ffwll.ch
