Re: [PATCH v4 03/42] drm/msm/dpu: Allow variable INTF_BLK size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/04/2023 01:30, Abhinav Kumar wrote:


On 4/4/2023 6:05 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx>

These blocks are of variable length on different SoCs. Set the
correct values where I was able to retrieve it from downstream
DTs and leave the old defaults (0x280) otherwise.

Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx>
[DB: fixed some lengths, split the INTF changes away]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>

Everything is fine except sm8250.

DPU | SoC      | INTF_DSI size
5.0 | sm8150   | 0x2bc
5.1 | sc8180x  | 0x2bc
6.0 | sm8250   | 0x2c0
6.2 | sc7180   | 0x2c0
6.3 | sm6115   | 0x2c0
6.5 | qcm2290  | 0x2c0
7.0 | sm8350   | 0x2c4
7.2 | sc7280   | 0x2c4
8.0 | sc8280xp | 0x300
8.1 | sm8450   | 0x300
9.0 | sm8550   | 0x300

Today sm8250 is using the same table as sm8150 but it needs 0x2c0 and not 0x2bc.

We should de-duplicate it add a new one for sm8250?

This is done in patch 22. It makes no sense to play with the data until we are clear, which platform uses which instance.

--
With best wishes
Dmitry




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux