On 04.04.2023 16:30, Nirmoy Das wrote:
Add a mechanism to keep existing data when creating
a ttm object with I915_BO_ALLOC_USER flag.
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_types.h | 15 +++++++++++----
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm_move.c | 5 +++--
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_types.h
index 5dcbbef31d44..830c11431ee8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_types.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_types.h
@@ -328,6 +328,12 @@ struct drm_i915_gem_object {
*/
#define I915_BO_ALLOC_GPU_ONLY BIT(6)
#define I915_BO_ALLOC_CCS_AUX BIT(7)
+/*
+ * Object is allowed to retain its initial data and will not be cleared on first
+ * access if used along with I915_BO_ALLOC_USER. This is mainly to keep
+ * preallocated framebuffer data intact while transitioning it to i915drmfb.
+ */
+#define I915_BO_PREALLOC BIT(8)
#define I915_BO_ALLOC_FLAGS (I915_BO_ALLOC_CONTIGUOUS | \
I915_BO_ALLOC_VOLATILE | \
I915_BO_ALLOC_CPU_CLEAR | \
@@ -335,10 +341,11 @@ struct drm_i915_gem_object {
I915_BO_ALLOC_PM_VOLATILE | \
I915_BO_ALLOC_PM_EARLY | \
I915_BO_ALLOC_GPU_ONLY | \
- I915_BO_ALLOC_CCS_AUX)
-#define I915_BO_READONLY BIT(8)
-#define I915_TILING_QUIRK_BIT 9 /* unknown swizzling; do not release! */
-#define I915_BO_PROTECTED BIT(10)
+ I915_BO_ALLOC_CCS_AUX | \
+ I915_BO_PREALLOC)
+#define I915_BO_READONLY BIT(9)
+#define I915_TILING_QUIRK_BIT 10 /* unknown swizzling; do not release! */
+#define I915_BO_PROTECTED BIT(11)
/**
* @mem_flags - Mutable placement-related flags
*
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm_move.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm_move.c
index dd188dfcc423..69eb20ed4d47 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm_move.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm_move.c
@@ -576,7 +576,7 @@ int i915_ttm_move(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, bool evict,
struct dma_fence *migration_fence = NULL;
struct ttm_tt *ttm = bo->ttm;
struct i915_refct_sgt *dst_rsgt;
- bool clear;
+ bool clear, prealloc_bo;
int ret;
if (GEM_WARN_ON(i915_ttm_is_ghost_object(bo))) {
@@ -632,7 +632,8 @@ int i915_ttm_move(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, bool evict,
return PTR_ERR(dst_rsgt);
clear = !i915_ttm_cpu_maps_iomem(bo->resource) && (!ttm || !ttm_tt_is_populated(ttm));
- if (!(clear && ttm && !(ttm->page_flags & TTM_TT_FLAG_ZERO_ALLOC))) {
+ prealloc_bo = obj->flags & I915_BO_PREALLOC;
+ if (!(clear && ttm && !((ttm->page_flags & TTM_TT_FLAG_ZERO_ALLOC) && !prealloc_bo))) {
This looks like school exercise for complicated usage of logical
operators, and I have problem with understanding this :)
Couldn't this be somehow simplified?
Anyway as the patch just reuses existing code:
Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@xxxxxxxxx>
Regards
Andrzej
struct i915_deps deps;
i915_deps_init(&deps, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_NOWARN);