Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: [...] >>> /* >>> * Remove the device from the device hierarchy. This is the right thing >>> - * to do for firmware-based DRM drivers, such as EFI, VESA or VGA. After >>> + * to do for firmware-based fb drivers, such as EFI, VESA or VGA. After >> >> That sentences is not well phrased. Maybe say 'This is required for >> firmware-provided graphics, such as EFI, VESA or VGA.' >> > > Graphic drivers or display drivers would indeed be more accurate here. But > I think that "fb drivers" is still well pharsed since the are other places > where either fbdev or DRM drivers for firmware-provided framebuffers are > named like that. > Sui, Maybe you could post a follow-up patch to improve the comment as suggested by Thomas? -- Best regards, Javier Martinez Canillas Core Platforms Red Hat
