Hi,
On 20/02/2023 23:10, Jonathan Cormier wrote:
From: Michael Williamson <michael.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
The logic to configure polling (vs async/irq notification) of hot-plug
events was not correct. If the connected bridge requires polling,
then inform the upstream bridge we also require polling.
Signed-off-by: Michael Williamson <michael.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cormier <jcormier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c
index bb3f8d0ff207..41007d05d584 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ static int tfp410_attach(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
return -ENODEV;
}
- if (dvi->next_bridge->ops & DRM_BRIDGE_OP_DETECT)
+ if (dvi->next_bridge->ops & DRM_BRIDGE_OP_HPD)
dvi->connector.polled = DRM_CONNECTOR_POLL_HPD;
else
dvi->connector.polled = DRM_CONNECTOR_POLL_CONNECT | DRM_CONNECTOR_POLL_DISCONNECT;
A Fixes tag is probably needed here ?
With that:
Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxx>
