RE: [PATCH v14 14/14] drm/msm/dp: set self refresh aware based on PSR support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2023 7:54 PM
> To: Vinod Polimera <vpolimer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Bjorn Andersson
> <andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>; Vinod Polimera (QUIC)
> <quic_vpolimer@xxxxxxxxxxx>; robdclark@xxxxxxxxx; dri-
> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-msm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> freedreno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Kalyan Thota (QUIC) <quic_kalyant@xxxxxxxxxxx>;
> dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx; Kuogee Hsieh (QUIC)
> <quic_khsieh@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Vishnuvardhan Prodduturi (QUIC)
> <quic_vproddut@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Bjorn Andersson (QUIC)
> <quic_bjorande@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Abhinav Kumar (QUIC)
> <quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Sankeerth Billakanti (QUIC)
> <quic_sbillaka@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 14/14] drm/msm/dp: set self refresh aware based
> on PSR support
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 8:47 AM Doug Anderson
> <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 8:16 AM Vinod Polimera
> > <vpolimer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Sent: Monday, March 27, 2023 9:58 PM
> > > > To: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>; Vinod Polimera (QUIC)
> > > > <quic_vpolimer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Cc: dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-msm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > > > freedreno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> > > > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; robdclark@xxxxxxxxx;
> dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > > > Kalyan Thota (QUIC) <quic_kalyant@xxxxxxxxxxx>;
> > > > dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx; Kuogee Hsieh (QUIC)
> > > > <quic_khsieh@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Vishnuvardhan Prodduturi (QUIC)
> > > > <quic_vproddut@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Bjorn Andersson (QUIC)
> > > > <quic_bjorande@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Abhinav Kumar (QUIC)
> > > > <quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Sankeerth Billakanti (QUIC)
> > > > <quic_sbillaka@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 14/14] drm/msm/dp: set self refresh aware
> based
> > > > on PSR support
> > > >
> > > > Quoting Bjorn Andersson (2023-03-26 09:35:56)
> > > > > On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 09:27:23AM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > > > > > On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 10:03:17PM +0530, Vinod Polimera wrote:
> > > > > > > For the PSR to kick in, self_refresh_aware has to be set.
> > > > > > > Initialize it based on the PSR support for the eDP interface.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > When I boot my sc8280xp devices (CRD and X13s) to console with
> this
> > > > > > patch included I get a login prompt, and then there are no more
> screen
> > > > > > updates.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Switching virtual terminal (ctrl+alt+fN) causes the screen to redraw.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Blindly login in and launching Wayland works and from then on
> screen
> > > > > > updates works as expected.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Switching from Wayland to another virtual terminal causes the
> problem
> > > > to
> > > > > > re-appear, no updates after the initial refresh, switching back go the
> > > > > > Wayland-terminal crashed the machine.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Also, trying to bring the eDP-screen back from DPMS gives me:
> > > > >
> > > > > <3>[ 2355.218099] [drm:dp_catalog_ctrl_set_pattern_state_bit
> [msm]]
> > > > *ERROR* set state_bit for link_train=1 failed
> > > > > <3>[ 2355.218926] [drm:dp_ctrl_setup_main_link [msm]] *ERROR*
> link
> > > > training #1 failed. ret=-110
> > > > > <3>[ 2355.262859] [drm:dp_catalog_ctrl_set_pattern_state_bit
> [msm]]
> > > > *ERROR* set state_bit for link_train=1 failed
> > > > > <3>[ 2355.263600] [drm:dp_ctrl_setup_main_link [msm]] *ERROR*
> link
> > > > training #1 failed. ret=-110
> > > > > <3>[ 2355.305211] [drm:dp_catalog_ctrl_set_pattern_state_bit
> [msm]]
> > > > *ERROR* set state_bit for link_train=1 failed
> > > > > <3>[ 2355.305955] [drm:dp_ctrl_setup_main_link [msm]] *ERROR*
> link
> > > > training #1 failed. ret=-110
> > > > > <3>[ 2355.345250] [drm:dp_catalog_ctrl_set_pattern_state_bit
> [msm]]
> > > > *ERROR* set state_bit for link_train=1 failed
> > > > > <3>[ 2355.346026] [drm:dp_ctrl_setup_main_link [msm]] *ERROR*
> link
> > > > training #1 failed. ret=-110
> > > > > <3>[ 2355.405650] [drm:dp_display_process_hpd_high [msm]]
> *ERROR*
> > > > failed to complete DP link training
> > > > > <3>[ 2355.668988]
> > > > [drm:dpu_encoder_phys_vid_wait_for_commit_done:488] [dpu
> > > > error]vblank timeout
> > > > > <3>[ 2355.669030] [drm:dpu_kms_wait_for_commit_done:510] [dpu
> > > > error]wait for commit done returned -110
> > > > > <3>[ 2355.699989] [drm:dpu_encoder_frame_done_timeout:2398]
> [dpu
> > > > error]enc35 frame done timeout
> > > > >
> > > > > And then the machine just resets.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I saw similar behavior on ChromeOS after we picked the PSR patches
> into
> > > > our kernel. I suspect it's the same problem. I switched back and forth
> > > > between VT2 and the OOBE screen with ctrl+alt+forward and that
> showed
> > > > what I typed on the virtual terminal after switching back and forth.
> > > > It's like the redraw only happens once on the switch and never again. I
> > > > switched back and forth enough times that it eventually crashed the
> > > > kernel and rebooted. This was on CRD (sc7280-herobrine-crd.dts).
> > > >
> > > > There's an animation on the OOBE screen that is working though, so
> > > > perhaps PSR is working with the chrome compositor but not the virtual
> > > > terminal? I haven't investigated.
> > >
> > > I was able to reproduce the issue where in virtual terminal, I don't see
> any screen refresh despite typing in.
> > > In the VT mode, I see that PSR is entered, but despite typing in there are
> no atomic commits triggered, hence the last buffer was always refreshed.
> > >
> > > Queries from my side to Rob & Doug:
> > > 1) In VT mode, does the framework operates in single buffer mode
> without any commit for new updates ?
> > > 2) if above is true then, how does driver know if the framework operates
> in single buffer mode, to make any appropriate action
> > > 3) what is the expected behavior with the driver here ? should it return
> atomic_check failure, for single buffer mode operation or, it should exit PSR ?
> > > 4) is there any HINT passed down to the driver so that we can bank on it
> and act accordingly?
> >
> > I haven't looked at this detail about PSR before, and I left my
> > PSR-enabled device at home so I can't easily test this right now. That
> > being said, from a bit of searching I would guess that
> > msm_framebuffer_dirtyfb() is somehow involved here. Are things better
> > if you get rid of the test against 'msm_fb->dirtyfb'?
> >
> > I at least used ftrace to confirm that on a different device
> > msm_framebuffer_dirtyfb() is not called during normal ChromeOS usage
> > but it _is_ called in VT2 usage.
> 
> Indeed, I can confirm that if I comment out the test in
> msm_framebuffer_dirtyfb() and just call straight through to
> drm_atomic_helper_dirtyfb() that typing on VT2 works fine.
> 
> ...so presumably you need to figure out how to get "dirtyfb" set
> properly when you have a PSR-enabled panel or maybe whenever the panel
> enters PSR mode?
> 
I have also observed the same and I am working on fixing it.

Thanks,
Vinod P.

> -Doug




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux