On 24/03/2023 08:26, Luca Weiss wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On Fri Mar 24, 2023 at 7:52 AM CET, Eric Biggers wrote:
>> Hi Neil,
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 02:10:44PM +0100, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 23/03/2023 11:49, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On 23/03/2023 11:25, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>>>>> Fixes the following DT bindings check error:
>>>>> ufshc@1d84000: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('reg-names' was unexpected)
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi | 1 -
>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
>>>>> index ef9bae2e6acc..8ecc48c7c5ef 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi
>>>>> @@ -3996,7 +3996,6 @@ ufs_mem_hc: ufshc@1d84000 {
>>>>> "jedec,ufs-2.0";
>>>>> reg = <0 0x01d84000 0 0x3000>,
>>>>> <0 0x01d88000 0 0x8000>;
>>>>> - reg-names = "std", "ice";
>>>>
>>>> This is also part of:
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20230308155838.1094920-8-abel.vesa@xxxxxxxxxx/#Z31arch:arm64:boot:dts:qcom:sm8450.dtsi
>>>> but I actually wonder whether you just missed some binding patch?
>>>
>>> I'm aware of Abel's RFC patchset to support shared ICE, but this is a cleanup of the current DT,
>>> and the current bindings schema doesn't document reg-names.
>>>
>>
>> The ufs-qcom driver accesses the "ice" registers by name, so the reg-names can't
>> be removed from the device tree. A few months ago there was a patch to fix the
>> device tree schema for qcom,ufs to include the reg-names. It looks like that
>> patch got missed, though:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221209-dt-binding-ufs-v2-2-dc7a04699579@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Are you implying that I should resend the patch or something? Not sure
> who to bug about applying this patch.
Yes, you should. It has been almost three months...
Best regards,
Krzysztof
