On 20.03.2023 00:57, Andi Shyti wrote:
Hi Andrzej,
On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 05:32:02PM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
From: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Extract the callstack tracking of intel_runtime_pm.c into its own
utility so that that we can reuse it for other online debugging of
scoped wakerefs.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Kconfig.debug | 9 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile | 4 +
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 222 +++----------------------
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wakeref.h | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wakeref_tracker.c | 234 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wakeref_tracker.h | 52 ++++++
6 files changed, 319 insertions(+), 204 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Kconfig.debug b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Kconfig.debug
index 93dfb7ed970547..5fde52107e3b44 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Kconfig.debug
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ config DRM_I915_DEBUG
select PREEMPT_COUNT
select I2C_CHARDEV
select STACKDEPOT
+ select STACKTRACE
select DRM_DP_AUX_CHARDEV
select X86_MSR # used by igt/pm_rpm
select DRM_VGEM # used by igt/prime_vgem (dmabuf interop checks)
@@ -37,6 +38,7 @@ config DRM_I915_DEBUG
select DRM_I915_DEBUG_GEM
select DRM_I915_DEBUG_GEM_ONCE
select DRM_I915_DEBUG_MMIO
+ select DRM_I915_TRACK_WAKEREF
select DRM_I915_DEBUG_RUNTIME_PM
select DRM_I915_SW_FENCE_DEBUG_OBJECTS
select DRM_I915_SELFTEST
@@ -227,11 +229,18 @@ config DRM_I915_DEBUG_VBLANK_EVADE
If in doubt, say "N".
+config DRM_I915_TRACK_WAKEREF
+ depends on STACKDEPOT
+ depends on STACKTRACE
+ bool
+
config DRM_I915_DEBUG_RUNTIME_PM
bool "Enable extra state checking for runtime PM"
depends on DRM_I915
default n
select STACKDEPOT
+ select STACKTRACE
+ select DRM_I915_TRACK_WAKEREF
help
Choose this option to turn on extra state checking for the
runtime PM functionality. This may introduce overhead during
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile
index b2f91a1f826858..42daff6d575a82 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile
@@ -81,6 +81,10 @@ i915-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS) += \
i915_debugfs_params.o \
display/intel_display_debugfs.o \
display/intel_pipe_crc.o
+
+i915-$(CONFIG_DRM_I915_TRACK_WAKEREF) += \
+ intel_wakeref_tracker.o
+
This patch, along with the previous one and two following it, is
a bit confusing. We add this file only to remove it later and
the code hops from file to file. There seem to be some extra
steps that could be avoided.
Is there room for simplification?
The reason behind this was that i915 had it's own tracker integrated
with i915_runtime_pm, then it was abstracted out (05,06) to allow track
gt->wakerefs (07) and then I proposed replacement of internal tracker
with ref_tracker (09). I wanted to keep original history of development.
I can squash all/some of this work, but I am afraid it will generate
less readable patches - now we have separated abstract-out and replace
steps.
Probably sending patches 05-08 1st, then proposing conversion to
ref_tracker in another patchset would make it more clear.
Regards
Andrzej
Thanks,
Andi
