Maybe "oneOf" should be added at least ?
compatible:
oneOf:
- enum:
Regards,
Alex
Le mer. 15 mars 2023 à 09:01, Alexandre Mergnat
<amergnat@xxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
>
> Le ven. 10 mars 2023 à 09:39, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> >
> > On 09/03/2023 15:23, Alexandre Mergnat wrote:
> > > Add compatible for the MT8365 SoC.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/mediatek,mutex.yaml | 1 +
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/mediatek,mutex.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/mediatek,mutex.yaml
> > > index ca0ca549257d..931d66893dff 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/mediatek,mutex.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/mediatek,mutex.yaml
> > > @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ properties:
> > > - mediatek,mt8186-mdp3-mutex
> > > - mediatek,mt8192-disp-mutex
> > > - mediatek,mt8195-disp-mutex
> > > + - mediatek,mt8365-disp-mutex
> >
> > All these look compatible. Either make mt8635 compatible with something
> > or even rework entire list and make everything compatible.
>
> All of them use "mtk_mutec.c" but have specific data.
>
> .data = &mt8173_mutex_driver_data},
> { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8183-disp-mutex",
> .data = &mt8183_mutex_driver_data},
> { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8186-disp-mutex",
> .data = &mt8186_mutex_driver_data},
> { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8186-mdp3-mutex",
> .data = &mt8186_mdp_mutex_driver_data},
> { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-disp-mutex",
> .data = &mt8192_mutex_driver_data},
> { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-disp-mutex",
> .data = &mt8195_mutex_driver_data},
> { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8365-disp-mutex",
> .data = &mt8365_mutex_driver_data},
>
> I don't see any SoC compatible with mt8635, and I have no idea which
> rework you have in mind. Can you please point me an example ?
>
> Thanks
> Alex
