Re: [PATCH 9/9] drm: move ttm_execbuf_util into vmwgfx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 3/8/23 10:10, Christian König wrote:
Am 08.03.23 um 06:14 schrieb Zack Rusin:
On Tue, 2023-02-28 at 09:34 +0100, Christian König wrote:
VMWGFX is the only remaining user of this and should probably moved over
to drm_exec when it starts using GEM as well.
Is this because vmwgfx piggybacks buffer-id relocations on top of ttm validations or did you just find it too hard to port it over? I'd prefer to avoid ttm moves to
vmwgfx and at least have a clear idea of what we need to do to port.

I've just found it to hard to port it over because vmwgfx does some strange things with the validation code here.

If you want we can take a deeper look at this together, but I need to find some time.

Alternatively just tell me how to do it and I will add that to the patch set :)

Regards,
Christian.

Hmm.

It turns out Xe was using these from the very start as well. But I will take a look at what it take to deprecate that usage, so don't let that stop this removal. We need a more flexible WW transaction handling anyway.

/Thomas



z



[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux