Re: [PATCH v5 3/4] drm/i915/selftests: use nop_clear_range instead of local function

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/4] drm/i915/selftests: use nop_clear_range instead of local function
From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2023 01:02:18 +0100
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>, Chris Wilson <chris.p.wilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20230308-guard_error_capture-v5-3-6d1410d13540@intel.com>
References: <20230308-guard_error_capture-v5-0-6d1410d13540@intel.com> <20230308-guard_error_capture-v5-3-6d1410d13540@intel.com>

Hi Andrzej,

On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 04:39:05PM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> Since nop_clear_range is visible it can be used here.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@xxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks,
Andi

References:
- [PATCH v5 0/4] drm/i915: add guard page to ggtt->error_capture
  - From: Andrzej Hajda
- [PATCH v5 3/4] drm/i915/selftests: use nop_clear_range instead of local function
  - From: Andrzej Hajda

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] drm/i915/display: use nop_clear_range instead of local function
Next by Date: Re: [RFC] drm: property: use vzalloc() instead of kvzalloc() for large blobs
Previous by thread: [PATCH v5 3/4] drm/i915/selftests: use nop_clear_range instead of local function
Next by thread: [PATCH v10 00/15] dma-fence: Deadline awareness
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux DRI Users] [Linux Intel Graphics] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [XFree86] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [XFree86]

Powered by Linux