On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 02:24:23PM +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 13:28:48 +0200 > Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 12:12:22PM +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > > > Oh! That would be really good to mention in the doc. Maybe even prefer > > > plane props over this? Or is this for analog TV, and plane props for > > > digital TV? > > > > Plane properties would be pointless for this. CRTC properties might > > make sense. But what is more accurate kinda depends on the hardware > > design. > > I meant the existing plane properties CRTC_X,Y,W,H. They can already > describe e.g. a primary plane that does not cover the whole CRTC area, > which is essentially the same as margins, scaling included even. Yeah that can work, assuming you have hardware that supports it. -- Ville Syrjälä Intel
