Il 24/02/23 11:08, Chen-Yu Tsai ha scritto:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 9:34 PM AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:The MediaTek MT8195 SoC has a Mali G57 MC5 (Valhall-JM) and has the same number of power domains and requirements as MT8192 in terms of bindings. Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml index 65fe139ceb83..4d9ab4702582 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml @@ -25,6 +25,11 @@ properties: - rockchip,px30-mali - rockchip,rk3568-mali - const: arm,mali-bifrost # Mali Bifrost GPU model/revision is fully discoverable + - items: + - enum: + - mediatek,mt8195-maliThis could be squashed into "- const: mediatek,mt8195-mali" like the following lines?
Could be, but I expect more compatibles on this list, that's why I've modeled that as enum. I prefer keeping this an enum.
Otherwise, Reviewed-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@xxxxxxxxxxxx>+ - const: mediatek,mt8192-mali + - const: arm,mali-valhall-jm # Mali Valhall GPU model/revision is fully discoverable - items: - enum: - mediatek,mt8192-mali -- 2.39.2
